On Tue, 06 Mar 2001 22:14:03 -0500, L.D. Best wrote:

> Hey, as long as it is just the directory/subdirectory name that is
> essential, there are lots of other places I'd rather install bob386. :>

> John mentioned on the page that his address is only in the packages now,
> but I searched every one of them and failed to find an e-dress for him;
> one SWAG e-dress I came up with failed the test ...  I just wanted to
> drop him a note to say that one of links isn't complete ... he forgot
> the .EXE extension on the new LICQ file he has up there.  If *you* know
> his e-dress, I'm sure he'd appreciate you dropping him a line and
> pointing that small omission out for him.

I have noticed recently that the extensions for many EXE and COM files are
frequently omitted when downloading from many various sites.  Maybe this
is something they are doing nowadays as a safety measure.  You can't
inadvertently run the program if you don't add the COM or EXE extension.

Sam

-- See our Big Gizmotimetemp at
-- http://banners.wunderground.com/banner/gizmotimetempbig/US/VA/Mt_Jackson.gif

Reply via email to