Elvis,


So does that mean a US based ISP such as QxC wanted / needed an additional IPv4 
allocation we could simply go to RIPE and get the IPv4 we want/need?


Thank you,
John W. Von Stein

[cid:sigimg0@791f5d9d52446f85c6fed00adec61823]

102 NE 2nd Street
Suite 136
Boca Raton, FL 33432
Office: 561-288-6989
www.QxCcommunications.com<http://www.qxccommunications.com/>

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Elvis Velea
Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2014 9:35 PM
To: David Huberman
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] About needs basis in 8.3 transfers



Hi David,



even further... for those that do not know yet, any legal or private person can 
become a member of the RIPE NCC while the ARIN policies/procedures still 
require a company to have a legal presence in the ARIN region in order to 
request resources.



And, btw.. have I already mentioned that the RIPE Community has completely 
removed the demonstrated need from their policy? I think I was only discussing 
this matter in the APNIC mailing lists and maybe those subscribed to this 
mailing list should also be aware of.



cheers,

elvis



On 05/06/14 03:30, David Huberman wrote:

> I agree completely, Elvis.  There's an argument to be made that if ARIN won't 
> be flexible with transfer policy, that RIPE becomes the most useful RIR for 
> operators to work within.  There's a further argument that's been made that 
> the time for regional IRs may be passed (past?) and that IETF should review 
> the situation.

>

> David R Huberman

> Microsoft Corporation

> Senior IT/OPS Program Manager (GFS)

>

> ________________________________________

> From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on

> behalf of Elvis Velea <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

> Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2014 6:21:52 PM

> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] About needs basis in 8.3 transfers

>

> Hi David,

>

> On 05/06/14 02:21, David Huberman wrote:

>> We're going to be a cross-roads very soon.  ARIN is going to exhaust, and 
>> network operators will be unable to obtain additional IPv4 address blocks 
>> from ARIN.  At that point, the most obvious solution for IPv4 needs will be 
>> the market.

> And then, they will be able to register as RIPE NCC members (LIRs) and

> receive as many IP addresses as they want without having to prove any

> demonstrated need. All they will need to do is to confirm that they

> will use these addresses for themselves or their customers.

>

>>    Proper stewardship of the ARIN function demands that ARIN policy adjust 
>> to what happens in the market.  It's not the other way around, if only 
>> because that's not how markets work.

>>

>> The ARIN CEO, ARIN's General Counsel, the Harvard economist ARIN pays, 
>> professors who study markets, brokers who operate in the market, and buyers 
>> and sellers who buy and sell in the market have all told the ARIN community 
>> the same story for around 5 years now: the market is going to act as a 
>> market, and ARIN policy needs to be ready for it; ARIN policy needs to make 
>> sense with the dynamics of the market.

>>

>> It's hard to know how to argue with operators like Owen and the

>> Google folks who all say the opposite; that ARIN policy should stick

>> to the same ideals as 1995 (important ideals for a very long time!)

>> and not adjust.  I fear the results of this kind of ostracism :(

> Well, then let them slowly kill the ARIN function. If all ARIN members

> can no longer get resources and they stop paying and go to the

> cheapest RIR (which btw is RIPE NCC with EUR1600/year no matter how

> many resources one has) and get as many resources they want... what do

> you think will happen?

>

> cheers,

> elvis

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> PPML

> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN

> Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>).

> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:

> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml

> Please contact [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> if you experience any 
> issues.



_______________________________________________

PPML

You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public 
Policy Mailing List ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>).

Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:

http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml

Please contact [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to