Chris, are your app server and web server on the same server?

Thanks,

Gary Opela, Jr., RSP
Remedy Engineer
Leader Communications, Inc.
http://www.5pointleader.com
http://www.lcibest.com
Best Product, Best People, Best PriceTM
An ISO 9001:2000 Certified, CMMI(r) Level 3 Rated Company
________________________________
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of strauss
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 1:50 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Question: Is anyone out there running Mid-Tier v7.1.0 on a 64-bit 
Windows 2003 OS with a 64-bit JVM?

We rate the mid-tier 7.1.00.002 performance (as we have it configured and the 
application forms pre-fetched) as follows:

On XP...
IE 7 is 10-20% faster than the User Tool (7.1.00.002 or 003)
Firefox is 10-20% slower than the User Tool
Safari is _significantly_ faster than everything else

On Vista...
IE 7 is 5-10% faster than the User Tool (7.1.00.002)
Firefox is 10-20% slower than the User Tool
Safari not tested yet

These comparisons hold up on XP and Vista running in Parallels on Mac OS X

On the x64 JVM, I would _hope_ that they get some support for it soon, since it 
will allow us to handle larger memory loads. I've never gotten the 32-bit JVM 
to behave properly when set to higher than 1536 Mb.

Christopher Strauss, Ph.D.
Call Tracking Administration Manager
University of North Texas Computing & IT Center
http://itsm.unt.edu/
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Bilinski, John
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 1:11 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Question: Is anyone out there running Mid-Tier v7.1.0 on a 64-bit 
Windows 2003 OS with a 64-bit JVM?

**
Thanks Strauss,

What would you rate your Mid-Tier's performance against the User Client when 
using, lets say Incident Management as a Support Staff user? 1:2? 1:4?

Also, the support tech I spoke with has no idea when BMC plan's to support the 
64-bit java virtual machines even with version 7.5. This makes no sense to me 
because you think that fully supporting a 64-bit environment would be a 
priority for an enterprise application right? Thanks.

________________________________
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of strauss
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 2:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Question: Is anyone out there running Mid-Tier v7.1.0 on a 64-bit 
Windows 2003 OS with a 64-bit JVM?
**
I cannot address load balancing or the 64-bit JVM, but I have had very good 
performance and stability (knock on wood) with mid-tier 7.1.00.002 on Win2K3 
Enterprise R2 x64 using the 32-bit Tomcat 5.5.26 (app server AND web server) on 
top of the 32-bit JDK 1.5.0_14.   I give the JVM 1536 mb min and max and a 
thread stack size of 3000, and I see it using about 900 mb max.  In our 
environment I have never seen it go over a gig, even when pre-fetching the ITSM 
7 applications, but it sounds like you will have more load in terms of 
concurrent users.  Our mid-tier is just serving 280 support staff users (55 
licenses) using the Service Desk in ITSM 7; the customers hit a Kinetic Request 
web on the same server which runs on its own instance of Tomcat 5.5.20 
(32-bit).  Hardware is an HP DL380 G5 with two quad-core Xeons and 12 gb RAM, 
and it's just loafing.  BTW, the AR Server is also on Win2K3 Enterprise x64 
(not R2, DL385, two dual-core Opterons) using the 32-bit JVM, with memory usage 
usually 700 mb but it peaks to over 1,290 mb during a prefetch.

Christopher Strauss, Ph.D.
Call Tracking Administration Manager
University of North Texas Computing & IT Center
http://itsm.unt.edu/
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Bilinski, John
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 12:23 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Question: Is anyone out there running Mid-Tier v7.1.0 on a 64-bit 
Windows 2003 OS with a 64-bit JVM?

**
All,

I just got off the phone with BMC Technical Support and they told me that they 
do not support nor recommend running Mid-Tier v7.1.0 on top of a 64-bit Java 
Virtual Machine. The reason why they do not support this is because their 
engineer's have not completed their testing Mid-Tier 7.1.0 with a 64-bit JVM. 
They did say that some of their customers are running this configuration anyway 
and some are not running into any issues but of course could not give me any 
people to talk too nor any details. This is not good because the first time 
around I talked to Remedy Support and they assured me that they supported 
64-bit OS's and that the server configuration below would handle what we want 
to accomplish so, confidently I ordered the servers. Now, to my surprise, I 
caught a sub-clause in their compatibility matrix that said they do not support 
the 64-bit JVM. This is bad news.

I would like to know if there is anyone out there that has this setup (below) 
or something like it, and I would like to know, if any, what bugs have you 
experienced with running Mid-Tier over a 64-bit JVM?

We plan to run 2 load balanced Mid-Tier servers each with Quad Xeon Intel based 
processors with 16GB of RAM using Windows 2003 64-bit as the OS and Tomcat as 
the JVM. We can only use Windows server so UNIX and Solaris are out of the 
question.

We plan to deploy the Mid-Tier to out customer base as part of a front-end 
customer support website where customers can submit and update their own 
tickets. We plan to scale the aforementioned server configuration out to about 
20,000 customers.

Will the 2 Web Servers support that type of environment? Also, with that many 
customers to be supported could those 2 servers also handle another 100 
licensed Support Staff?

Are their any other options?

Thanks.


__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" html___
__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" html___
__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" html___
__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" html___

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to