Robert, that sounds like a lot of work. You may have already done this, but
I would officially let your Remedy sales team know that you're moving off
the platform, and give them a chance to work through some alternatives.

Shuller, Drew CTR USSOUTHCOM JTFB/C4S

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Spangler Robert C CIV USSTRATCOM/JWAC <
rspan...@jwac.mil> wrote:

> There was a 3 month window where we moved from version 4.5 (Yes you are
> reading the version correctly) to 7.6.  The admin that was working 4.5 was a
> little :-) resistant to move to a new version.  Right after we went live,
> there was a budget reduction and a RIF.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Jason Miller
> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 4:33 PM
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> Subject: Re: SDE versus ARS
>
> ** Robert,
>
> Am I reading this right that you were in production less than a year before
> the decision was made to move away from the full suite?  Can you share how
> long it took to get into production?  It sounds like a very short lived
> implementation.
>
> Jason
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Spangler Robert C CIV USSTRATCOM/JWAC <
> rspan...@jwac.mil> wrote:
>
>
>        Thanks for all the info.  We only have one external integration, no
> import/update jobs, no tables that have been exported and very few reports
> and no reporting server.  All of our end users are using the web interface
> at this point.  We only have 3 support people that are using the UT.  We are
> basically only using ARS as a ticketing and assets management platform.  We
> haven't been live long enough to get involved in Change, SRM and some of the
> other modules we wanted to use.
>
>        Yes, we have to migrate the data.  We have had ARS version 7.5 up
> for almost one year at this point and management has told us that with our
> budget restrictions we can no longer afford ARS, no matter how long it takes
> to migrate.  We have to find a new, read less expensive, solution.  Given
> that we still have maintenance, we can get issues resolved in ARS while we
> work to identify, purchase and stand up a new system.  SDE was one option
> for us. I have also looked at some of the other players in the help desk
> arena along with open source solutions.  It sounds like it will be no easy
> task, but I figure at this point there is no easy solution out there.
>
>
>        -----Original Message-----
>        From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of William H. Du Chene
>        Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 2:20 PM
>        To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
>
>        Subject: Re: SDE versus ARS
>
>        **
>        I have worked with both of them over the years and have a fair
> amount of experience with both products. There are a number of things that
> you should know and prepare for.
>
>        I guess the first question is going to be: how deep down the rabbit
> hole do you want to go?
>
>        Do you have any external integrations which make use of your
> ARSystem database? Do you have any import/update jobs (or the like) that
> make use of DTS/SSIS (or similar technology) which update records directly?
> Do you have any tables that have been exported for use in your database
> (with vendor forms) from external sources? Do you have a significant number
> of reports that query the database for data, or are you using a reporting
> server? Have you developed any applications which use the API to process
> data  - outside of the normal workflow (active link, filter, guide)
> paradigm?
>
>        And the big question: Are you planning on migrating your existing
> data?
>
>        Depending on how you have your installation set up and what your
> requirements are, a migration may well be a nightmare.
>
>        If you switch platforms, the glaringly obvious stuff would be that
> all of your reports have to change, you'll have to recreate all of your user
> accounts (or your integration to the LDAP/AD), any packages for moving and
> updating data that your DBA might have set up, any custom views, database
> objects (SPs, UDFs), or API applications become useless and you will have to
> redo or retire them.
>
>        Be prepared also that the database schemas between the application
> suites are different as well.
>
>        For example, within the AR System, everyone knows that there are the
> "wonderfully insightful" T, H, and B tables to work with with all of the C
> columns inside that make an odd sort of sense once you get used to them. On
> the SDE side, throw that schema completely out the window because there are
> now _SMDBA_._CUSTOMER_ and _SMDBA_.TELMASTE_ tables to deal with. The
> "telmaste" table is actually the applications version of an incident table.
> The name makes a lot of sense. Go figure. Likewise, each user receives an
> account on the database server, and each group that is created automatically
> generates an entire series of views for each of the modules. Each group
> added, therefore, owns objects within the database.
>
>        Behind the scenes, there are many, many differences which should be
> accounted for - carefully - before a migration comes to mind and that should
> be considered before making a choice.
>
>        Likewise, if you have the UT installed in your environment, you will
> need to remove it from your desktops. (If your're running just the midtier
> for your users to use, this might not be an issue.) The SDE is web based.
> There is no desktop client to use (so if you have any desktop level
> automation going on, it's now useless also if you move).
>
>        Superficially, the two products have some similarities - a ticket is
> still a ticket - but that is where the similarity ends.
>
>        Finally, if I were in your shoes and they were talking about moving
> to another platform (in spite of how much I encourage people to find an open
> source solution, a low cost solution with another product, or to write their
> own due to the cost of both products and the lack of a developer
> subscription) I would ask them if they had crack for breakfast. They're not
> talking about an overnight thing with a migration, but rather a blood, sweat
> and tears effort that would take months (depending on what your current
> implementation is like) to even get off the ground. They are committed to
> what they have, and unless their willing to change radically, it's a mute
> point.
>
>
>
>
>        ________________________________
>
>        From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Spangler Robert C CIV USSTRATCOM/JWAC
>        Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 12:41 PM
>        To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
>        Subject: SDE versus ARS
>
>
>        **
>
>        Going out on a limb, but we are being forced to move away from
> Remedy due to budget and personnel reductions.  Was wondering if any of you
> guys knew much about Service Desk Express (SDE).  We were primarily using
> ARS for ticketing and assets management, had never broken into Change, SRM
> and some other goodies that we had plans for.    BMC suggested SDE as an
> alternative so we were going to look in to.  Thanks for any advice or
> suggestions!
>
>        _attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
> _attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
>
>
>
>  
> _______________________________________________________________________________
>        UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
>        attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
>
>
>
> _attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
>

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to