If you don't mind, what size is the company? (users, annual revenue)...
I have often wondered what size company it takes to make ARS feasible
without having to skimp too much and cut too many corners.

It would be interesting to see some sort of Gartner like report on
typical how much money companies are spending per user supported on ITSM
related apps.

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Spangler Robert C CIV
USSTRATCOM/JWAC
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 4:36 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: SDE versus ARS

There was a 3 month window where we moved from version 4.5 (Yes you are
reading the version correctly) to 7.6.  The admin that was working 4.5
was a little :-) resistant to move to a new version.  Right after we
went live, there was a budget reduction and a RIF.

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason Miller
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 4:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: SDE versus ARS

** Robert,

Am I reading this right that you were in production less than a year
before the decision was made to move away from the full suite?  Can you
share how long it took to get into production?  It sounds like a very
short lived implementation.

Jason


On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Spangler Robert C CIV USSTRATCOM/JWAC
<[email protected]> wrote:


        Thanks for all the info.  We only have one external integration,
no import/update jobs, no tables that have been exported and very few
reports and no reporting server.  All of our end users are using the web
interface at this point.  We only have 3 support people that are using
the UT.  We are basically only using ARS as a ticketing and assets
management platform.  We haven't been live long enough to get involved
in Change, SRM and some of the other modules we wanted to use.
        
        Yes, we have to migrate the data.  We have had ARS version 7.5
up for almost one year at this point and management has told us that
with our budget restrictions we can no longer afford ARS, no matter how
long it takes to migrate.  We have to find a new, read less expensive,
solution.  Given that we still have maintenance, we can get issues
resolved in ARS while we work to identify, purchase and stand up a new
system.  SDE was one option for us. I have also looked at some of the
other players in the help desk arena along with open source solutions.
It sounds like it will be no easy task, but I figure at this point there
is no easy solution out there.
        

        -----Original Message-----
        From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of William H. Du Chene
        Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 2:20 PM
        To: [email protected]
        
        Subject: Re: SDE versus ARS
        
        **
        I have worked with both of them over the years and have a fair
amount of experience with both products. There are a number of things
that you should know and prepare for.
        
        I guess the first question is going to be: how deep down the
rabbit hole do you want to go?
        
        Do you have any external integrations which make use of your
ARSystem database? Do you have any import/update jobs (or the like) that
make use of DTS/SSIS (or similar technology) which update records
directly? Do you have any tables that have been exported for use in your
database (with vendor forms) from external sources? Do you have a
significant number of reports that query the database for data, or are
you using a reporting server? Have you developed any applications which
use the API to process data  - outside of the normal workflow (active
link, filter, guide) paradigm?
        
        And the big question: Are you planning on migrating your
existing data?
        
        Depending on how you have your installation set up and what your
requirements are, a migration may well be a nightmare.
        
        If you switch platforms, the glaringly obvious stuff would be
that all of your reports have to change, you'll have to recreate all of
your user accounts (or your integration to the LDAP/AD), any packages
for moving and updating data that your DBA might have set up, any custom
views, database objects (SPs, UDFs), or API applications become useless
and you will have to redo or retire them.
        
        Be prepared also that the database schemas between the
application suites are different as well.
        
        For example, within the AR System, everyone knows that there are
the "wonderfully insightful" T, H, and B tables to work with with all of
the C columns inside that make an odd sort of sense once you get used to
them. On the SDE side, throw that schema completely out the window
because there are now _SMDBA_._CUSTOMER_ and _SMDBA_.TELMASTE_ tables to
deal with. The "telmaste" table is actually the applications version of
an incident table. The name makes a lot of sense. Go figure. Likewise,
each user receives an account on the database server, and each group
that is created automatically generates an entire series of views for
each of the modules. Each group added, therefore, owns objects within
the database.
        
        Behind the scenes, there are many, many differences which should
be accounted for - carefully - before a migration comes to mind and that
should be considered before making a choice.
        
        Likewise, if you have the UT installed in your environment, you
will need to remove it from your desktops. (If your're running just the
midtier for your users to use, this might not be an issue.) The SDE is
web based. There is no desktop client to use (so if you have any desktop
level automation going on, it's now useless also if you move).
        
        Superficially, the two products have some similarities - a
ticket is still a ticket - but that is where the similarity ends.
        
        Finally, if I were in your shoes and they were talking about
moving to another platform (in spite of how much I encourage people to
find an open source solution, a low cost solution with another product,
or to write their own due to the cost of both products and the lack of a
developer subscription) I would ask them if they had crack for
breakfast. They're not talking about an overnight thing with a
migration, but rather a blood, sweat and tears effort that would take
months (depending on what your current implementation is like) to even
get off the ground. They are committed to what they have, and unless
their willing to change radically, it's a mute point.
        
        
        
        
        ________________________________
        
        From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Spangler Robert C CIV
USSTRATCOM/JWAC
        Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 12:41 PM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: SDE versus ARS
        
        
        **
        
        Going out on a limb, but we are being forced to move away from
Remedy due to budget and personnel reductions.  Was wondering if any of
you guys knew much about Service Desk Express (SDE).  We were primarily
using ARS for ticketing and assets management, had never broken into
Change, SRM and some other goodies that we had plans for.    BMC
suggested SDE as an alternative so we were going to look in to.  Thanks
for any advice or suggestions!
        
        _attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
        
        
        
________________________________________________________________________
_______
        UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
        attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
        


_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ 

________________________________________________________________________
_______
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
*******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please
notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this
email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses.
www.Hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated**


_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to