**
 
That's a scary thought.  I hope they do not have this  point of view with 
any other application.  It's unfortunate because  BMC is a really good 
product, however our  Managers are sending out  this bad publicity due to a 
lack 
of understanding of the BMC  products.  When I try to explain - it's like 
talking to sheet  rock.  Nice people, but I'm not sure why they are not 
listening to the  professional recommendations the BMC SMEs that they  hire.  
Meanwhile we have all these great BMC tools and we are not  leveraging the 
technology. 
 
A year ago, I created 1 field in a regular table.  I  heard noise about it 
of course - my phone was ringing right away.  I  was told this new field 
made them really "nervous" and code changes are not  allowed - contact BMC for 
a hotfix instead.  I'm still trying to wrap my  mind around this.  I wish 
Doug would have a chat with  them.
 
 
From: Action Request  System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of arslist
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 4:35 PM
To:  [email protected]
Subject: Re: Customization
 
 
**  
Does  your company have the same unrealistic view of all application 
software or  only BMC’s? 
Feels  like a Friday type thread, only a Dilbert version of it. 
Dan 
From: Action Request  System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf  Of Koyb P. Liabt
Sent: October 18, 2013 11:06 AM
To:  [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) 
Subject:  Re: Customization 
**  
** 
 
We  are on AR System/ITSM 7.6.4 and I have explained to the team that we 
have  overlays which manages these code changes. The reply was "No code 
changes -  and BMC has to fix their application."  (oh  brother)
 

 
 
From:  Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:[email protected]] On  Behalf Of Tauf Chowdhury
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 9:41  AM
To: [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) 
Subject:  Re: Customization
 
**  
 
What version are you on? In the newer  versions, BMC has made it "easier" 
to customize the system and every  version, they try to take more and more 
customer "customizations" and make  them something you can configure within 
the tool. So I guess the first  question is if you are on a version that 
supports overlays (7.6.04  +).  
 
It may then be a good idea to get in touch  with your company's sales guy 
and explain to him the negative opinion  everyone has about the product and 
said comments about the "no  customization" rule. I'm sure the sales person 
will be interested in  smoothing things over if he cares about doing more 
business. Ask him/her to  set up a meeting with product management and have a 
real, in person,  discussion with them about the direction of the product and 
what you  should/shouldn't do. 
 
Worst case scenario, hit the job market.  Sounds like a crappy environment 
to work in. There are plenty of great  opportunities out there. I believe 
Unisys is  hiring.
 
Hope this  helps.

 
 
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Koyb P.  Liabt <[email protected]_ 
(mailto:[email protected]) >  wrote: 
**  
 
 
Hi,
 

 
We  have a serious issue.  Our company has strictly mandated that no  
customizations be made to our ITSM system - unless BMC does it via a  "Hotfix." 
 
Management states that BMC informed them "not to  customize."  (I believe 
it's more than an issue related to upgrades -  not sure what all was 
communiccated).  As result, whenever there is a  change that needs to be made - 
their 
position is.." it's BMC's  responsibility to fix their application."  For 
example, if there are  OOB fields marked as 'optional" and our company wants 
the fields to  be "required" - then the oweness is on BMC to fix it.  This 
is  what our company calls "a broken piece of code that needs a  hotfix."  
(how absurd).  Internal developers are to  administer the data and are not 
able to create a form, add a field, create  an active link, filter etc - it 
might "break Remedy  more."   Only four filters were created over the two  
years from our team.  To make a code change, it  requires several pages of an 
essay detailing why we need this new  code, weeks of meetings to discuss the 
filter, Sr. Management must be  notified, then go through the CAB review 
board,  etc.... 
 

 
Unfortunately,  because of this "no customize" delusion, our  company views 
the ITSM OOB applications as "junk" because it does  not meet requirements 
that continually change as we mature as a  company.  Harsh statements are 
daily communicated throughout our  company over these issues.  Whenever a 
field and/or workflow does not  match their "wish list" - almost every meeting, 
people are walking  around complaining that the "tool just does not work."  
This is so far  from the truth! I have explained many times the concept  of 
"software development application" and "developer."  BMC  packaged ITSM 
based on industry standard (and other factors) that contains  software 
development applications that supports IT Service  Management.  BMC cannot 
predict 
which fields you want to be  required in every single case.  Each company is 
different.  Yes,  standardize as much as possible, however if you need to 
modify the code to  fit your business requirement - then do so.   
 

 
I  spoke with BMC technical support and asked the technician what is BMC  
communicating regarding customizations - because our Sr. Management is  
stating BMC warned them not to customize.  The BMC tech informed me  that we 
should not customize ITSM. ??  Where on earth is this  coming from?
 

 
If I  needed to change the field from a numerical "9" to the word "nine" on 
a  form - the decision makers on our team would flip out.  The  reality is, 
we have a great need to create tables to manage data and for  integrations 
- however we cannot :(   
 


_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have  been for 20 years_




-- 
Tauf  Chowdhury
_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have  been for 20 years_ 


_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have  been for 20 years_ 
_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20  years_


_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"

Reply via email to