no My test shows both works with no diff in asciidoc
On Dec 19, 2012, at 5:47 PM, Alex Efros <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:24:34PM -0500, ping wrote: >> bug found , about literal block highlight: > > As far as I remember standard asciidoc highlight work in this way, > so if this really a bug (I'm afraid this may be correct highlight if > asciidoc itself work in this way) it should be reported to Stuart. > > -- > WBR, Alex. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "asciidoc" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "asciidoc" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en.
