Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 19, 2012, at 7:12 PM, Alex Efros <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 06:46:53PM -0500, Ping wrote: >> no >> My test shows both works with no diff in asciidoc > > On my system second paragraph doesn't highlighted when I remove all my > custom files and use only standard asciidoc highlight. > What I meant is Both can be converted to the same HTML without diff But yes 2nd paragraph was not highlighted as I reported > So, maybe we're using different versions, or you've some non-standard > fixes. File /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/syntax/asciidoc.vim on my system has > size 10666 bytes and md5 98882aaf67dd1c907671fe2f49417949. I'm using > asciidoc 8.6.7. > > If you're using newer asciidoc, then maybe this issue was already fixed in > standard highlight after 8.6.7, but my conceal implementation contain some > copy&paste from 8.6.7's standard highlight (with some modifications), thus > it may overwrite newer fixed highlight with older version. But I don't > really think this is the case - because my conceal highlight doesn't touch > literal paragraphs at all, it change only inline things like bold/italic. > > -- > WBR, Alex. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "asciidoc" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "asciidoc" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en.
