On 9/20/2007, Micheal Espinola Jr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On 9/20/07, Jeroen van Aart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> As a side note, I wouldn't call an auto reply spam, it is not bulk >> email.
> In legal terms, spam isn't bulk mail. Its anything that you didn't > want to receive. The precedent has already been established. I'm not sure where you got that definition, but the phrase 'prove it' comes to mind. What precedent, established when and where? >> " A message is Spam only if it is both Unsolicited and Bulk. >> - Unsolicited Email is normal email >> (examples: first contact enquiries, job enquiries, sales enquiries) >> >> - Bulk Email is normal email >> (examples: subscriber newsletters, customer communications, discussion >> lists)" > They have an excellent point, and thier definition is used as a > reference in many court cases. Oh, ok, I see here you essentially agree that what you wrote before was plain wrong... -- Best regards, Charles ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
