Amazing info everyone. I can't thank you enough as to how much time you saved me. I will go over all the links and start my readings. In the meanwhile I have the following questions:
- So, something in the order to 10 Mbps "full duplex" or whatever the term is for "both ways" should be very easily achievable using the equipments mentioned? - Has anyone tested this for telephony application? - How is the round trip delay usually? - Does very cold or hot weather have an effect on the operation? rain or thunder? (e.g. degraded bandwidth or lots of errors in packets?) , has anyone had the issue of directed "intentional" interference or other types of interference which would make this connection any less solid than a DSL or Rogers cable on daily or weekly basis? - What about NLOS solutions? Are there any viable product for that as well? Obstacles could be tree or buildings. Thanks again, Bruce On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:19 AM, James Knott <[email protected]>wrote: > That price is in the same ball park as Ceragon. The Ceragon gear I've > worked with has lower bandwidth, but greater range. (18 Mb/s @ 35 Km IIRC) > > > Mike - QTI wrote: > >> Phil, >> >> Thanks for the info on Ubiquiti . >> >> Seems they have a great bunch of engineers ( who worked on the Motorola >> Canopy system ). The AirFibre looks awesome. 1500 for both ends ( >> http://www.ubnt.com/store/**airfiber/airfiber_24<http://www.ubnt.com/store/airfiber/airfiber_24>) >> and 1.4 Gbps over 13+km. Just need an available date. >> >> Mike >> >> >> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 7:27 AM, James Knott <[email protected]<mailto: >> [email protected]**>> wrote: >> >> Reza - Voipernetics wrote: >> >> I know of members in TAUG - who has achieved two way >> communication with clear line of site, using nothing but off >> the shelf Linksys routers and dish antemma's - having achieved >> 80+ KM range. Their only complaint was its was a royal pain >> the the behind, to aim properly. Basic geometry and the >> assistance of GPS equipment and measurements got the antenna's >> to be aligned on a clear line of sight. What I've been told >> is the margin of error with the consumer dish antennas is a >> mere 3 degrees conical beam. >> >> >> While it may be possible to do this with consumer level gear, one >> has to look at the whole picture? Is this for a business? If so, >> it may be better to go with equipment designed for the job, rather >> than going for lowest cost. I had mentioned to brands of >> microwave hardware that are designed for this sort of task. They >> are physically much more rugged than consumer gear, so as to stand >> up to wind etc. They also have significant protection against >> lightning induced surges. While it may be OK to go cheap for >> personal use, when you have business use and potential liability >> on the line, going cheap may be the wrong way to go. >> >> >> ------------------------------**------------------------------** >> --------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> <mailto:asterisk-unsubscribe@**uc.org <[email protected]>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Mike Ashton >> CTO >> Quality Track International >> >> Phone: +1 647.724.3500 x251 >> Cell: +1 416.527.4995 >> >> > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
