opaqueice Wrote: 
> In any case one thing which some people (such as the makers of this
> "memory drive" and a forum poster or two) seem to be missing is that
> error correction is NOT the same thing as interpolation.  Successful
> error correction means (surprise surprise!) that the error is
> corrected, so that the correct bits get sent to the DAC.  This is
> possible because there is redundant information on the CD, which allows
> re-reading and correction of an error.
So how "memory drive" makers explain why PC with something like SB
isn't enough?..

BTW, redundancy is limited, always. 100% redundancy means a second copy
of the whole CD. This is why error correction implemented in the
standard CD player isn't worth much. 
I remember I read somewhere that CDP has to use interpolation much more
often then "error correction" exactly due to insufficient redundancy. In
those cases ability to re-read the same place several times on different
speeds is much more effective.


-- 
325xi
------------------------------------------------------------------------
325xi's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5661
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=24957

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to