amey01;655744 Wrote: > I don't think we need to turn this thread into a discussion about > digital theory. > > There is plenty of information about why 16/44.1 was never going to be > sufficient for quality audio (eg. filtering, anti-aliasing, distortion, > loss of low-level resolution and finally raw bandwith limitation, etc). So basically you understand the theoretical limitations of 16/44.1 and then leap to the conclusion that it must be audible to a human being listening to music in a normal domestic situation.
There is precisely zero evidence from properly conducted trials that a hi-res recording correctly resampled to 16/44.1 and played back at normal listening levels sounds any different. -- cliveb Transporter -> ATC SCM100A ------------------------------------------------------------------------ cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89733 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
