SoftwireEngineer wrote: 
> I feel very silly talking to people with Meridian processors about
> jitter :-)  Why do you think these equipment are so pricey ? The HD621
> has a buffer and reclocks things out.  I feel like I am justifying your
> purchases !!

The price is markup expensive exterior design and the very small series
and they dont get obselete, if more people wanted this stuff it could be
built in china for a fraction of the price, but i bought it anyway after
much hesitation :)

The HD621 is not the main processor it is a hdmi switch and signal
converter to MHR so that my old G68J processor that does not have hdmi
can use the signals .
And yes both my processors have some sort of jitter attenuation the hdmi
processor the most as many hdmi sources have *really* large amounts of
jitter I would not call the humax dtv box i have high end  .
But that is the whole point , all digital *sources* are the same to me
.
The processor is still not obselete due to the add on HD621 for hdmi ,
you also get that for the money digital stuff that does not get obsolete
for decades .

Meridian processors are not unique in their capacity to suppress jitter
everything has it nowadays I bougth the processor and DVDA player in
2004 it migth have been rarer and costlier back then .

But it is bit apples and oranges , the complete meridian system works
like this the DAC's are in the speakers so the processor does room
acoustics processing and subwoofer xover and surround sound fields and
tone controls and source selection the processor in turn have special
digital outputs for meridian speakers and a control bus for volume etc
so the cross overs in the speakers are digital with all kids of
corrections and eq for the drivers there is one DAC per register in each
speaker and one amp per element in the speakers . I have no clue to
exactly what dac's they are .
But it seems to work as far as i can tell  . So processor actually
buffers 100's of milliseconds of data and there are some latency in the
speakers too and of-course MHR and speakerlink how does that work ? the
specs are not open .

So there is much more to a Meridian system than "jitter" the whole
architecture is correct , I've yet to find another system that is 
that’s Meridian strength it is a complete system .

What do I mean by that, theoretically a DVDA disc has 144dB s/n quickly
turning it over to analog directly in the player is just silly and not
how you should do it ,kiss >40dB sn goodbye . In my case the SQ loss
happens first in the speakers when the DAC for each element kicks in
there are practically no loss in sound quality in the chain before that
. that was unique in 2000 when Meridian had this (well they had it for
CD resolution in the 90's ).

Nowadays with the latest HDMI variants many of todays HT recievers have
this you player can send CD/DVDA/SACD/Bluray in all kinds of resolution
directly to the receiver . this was not very common back when DVDA/SACD
was released a decade ago .
Now Meridian still have an unique selling point in their digital
speakers that takes this further .

So yes the mass-market homet heater stuff are gaining ground , the high
end are still stuck in there tube an cable fetish ?

BTW Meridian operates mostly in 24/88.2 or 24/96 the speakers are
limited to that, and the G68J and HD621 down converts if needed ( they
can receive such signals ).
Why is that ? Meridian has the opinion that higher resolution does not
gain you anything at all it would only make the equipment cost more as
it should do all this DSP with 2*memory and CPU and not sound any better
.

Whats missing IMO is an open digital speaker protocoll . at least active
analougue speakers are becoming more common for home environment so in a
couple of decades more a home theater/hifi may actually have a decent
basic architecture .
The passive speaker paradigm was obsolete in the 70's so who are ludites
in this realm :) and not wanting the best technology for the jobb .
Imho the conservatism in the audiophile circles have at least kept back
the development 40 years if not more .

Ok cables the MHR link requires rj45 conectors and have the same
impedance as ethernet so you use normal cat5e  cables and yes I don’t
use brand name ethernet cables here , i use patch cables I found on the
supermarket .


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to