Hey everybody,
I deleted the previous review file and uploaded a new one with the fixes
to the Table of Contents. I hope that was the right way to handle that.
Sorry about the confusion.
Gary, I tried your suggestion for rejecting the note, unfortunately it
didn't work. It set the note back into an "undeleted" state, and when I
tried to delete it again it just put the X through it as before.
Thanks,
Sak.
Gary Schnabl wrote:
Sak wrote:
Hey guys,
I've uploaded a review of Chapter 1 for the Writer's Guide into the
feedback folder:
http://oooauthors.org/en/authors/userguide3/writer3/feedback/0201WG-IntroducingWriter_20080717_Sak.odt
I think I did that right. ;)
Anyway, I added a sentence in the Zoom section, and a paragraph and
picture relating to toolbar customization. Not sure it was necessary,
but it seemed appropriate. Let me know what you think.
I also found that the discussion on rolling up floating toolbars may
have been accidentally removed between versions *20080715 and
*20080716, with the entry still remaining in the Table of Contents.
So I just copied the original text from *20080715 back in place and
fixed the pagination in the contents to coincide with the new
paragraph on toolbar customization. Other than that, after a few
passes I only found one little punctuation change.
In regards to notes; during my passes I would make notes to myself
relating to things I wanted to lookup, or fix, write about, etc. When
deleting those notes, one of them didn't seem to want to go away. I'm
not sure if that's a bug, but I plan to try and see if I can reproduce
it and file something for the QA folks. Anyway, I just wanted to
explain the mysterious, pseudo-deleted note that I'm sure you'll be
wondering about. ;) Otherwise, I absolutely adore the new notes
feature, and use it like a fiend.
I also have Chapter 2 checked out, and will start on it in the next
day or so and upload any feedback.
Thanks,
Sak.
Out of curiosity, what Writer version did you use?
I noticed hard-to-junk (impossible?) notes before, too. So, that might
be a bug. One way to counteract that would be to insert a note with the
tracked changes running. Then, afterwards, you could reject the note.
Gary
