Good morning, I see you have been busy... good!
2008/7/18 Jean Hollis Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Earlier, I wrote: >> >> Sak wrote: >>> >>> There's also something weird that happened with the numbered list style >>> that I'm not sure about. When the pages re-flowed because of the new >>> material, the numbers are now outside of the page border. This normally happens if you use the numbering on/off on the numbering toolbar which is not recommended as you should only use paragraph styles for numbering. >> >> I've seen some weird effects in some files recently, but not that >> particular one. > > This numbering problem may (or may not) be related to one or more bugs to do > with numbered lists, that should be fixed in m26 or m27. The issue has been fixed and verified. It is called something like sw09.... and hopefully will be integrated in m26. when Joost publishes the release notes just look out for this item in the list (I will do so too). > > Or it may be an artefact of the several changes of template that chapter has > gone through in the past few weeks. I'll do a couple of tests later today > and see what I can discover. I can see that the numbering style has lost its > indentation settings, but what might have caused that needs investigation. I > sure hope it doesn't happen in (too many) other chapters! My hope is that when the the issue fix has been integrated all the numbering will be automagically fixed. If not the only way to fix it is rather complicated. Regarding the issue with "sticky" notes I think this is an already reported bug but I do not know the status. I know it has been proposed as a showstopper but did not follow too closely the discussion. On moving all the customizations to an appendix I am OK with it, but I am not sure if I understood correctly: will it be a separate chapter? On the level of details in the description of the options, I am again in favour not to put too many details, on the other hand there is a large percentage of users who will only ever use Writer therefore we should try to find good compromise. For example, increasing the memory allocated to OOo increases dramatically the performances (even more improvements can be obtained removing Java): should this information which is not Writer-specific be captured? I will re-read the thread later on and write again if I forgot something :-) Cheers, Michele
