If it has its own cvs tree then it seems odd to have "axis" in the name. It doesn't really matter much to me as long as the names are consistent, either they both have "axis" or neither do. -Dug
"Paul Fremantle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/15/2002 03:11:41 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: Re: WSIF proposal Dug What do you think? I proposed xml-axis-wsif, because I know that there is some view of Axis as "brand" for apache web services. WSIF isn't really an XML project (it can call non-xml systems) and it isnt really a sub-project of Axis as it is today. In a way I'd rather see a number of web services components that work together, but on the other hand I'd also like to get the CVS tree set up this month :-) Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 5:36 PM Subject: Re: WSIF proposal > If the package name is org.apache.wsif (not org.apache.axis.wsif) why would > the tree be named xml-axis-wsif instead of just xml-wsif? > -Dug > > > "Paul Fremantle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/15/2002 10:30:04 AM > > Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > cc: > Subject: WSIF proposal > > > > > > Folks > > We have done the updates to WSIF to get it to work with Axis beta 2. We > are still working on the build changes to make the build more modular. > > I would like to set up a CVS tree to post this work, and so we can post > this and carry on the build work in the public space. > > To do this, I'd like votes please on: > > cvs tree name: > > proposal: xml-axis-wsif > > package name: > > proposal: org.apache.wsif.* > > Once we get this resolved I'll post this asap. > > Thanks > Paul > > > > >
