Ok. I agree with the package name (org.apache.wsif.*) Paul, Is it ok for WSIF to be under Axis (website, module name etc)? If yes, am ok with xml-axis-wsif. This choice will definitely save time. If you want to bring it up on [EMAIL PROTECTED], you can count on my support. Its upto you.
Sam, Do you think we are ready for a "Web Services PMC" discussion? James thinks we do. James, I'd be more comfortable if i see some participation from SUN given the laundry list of Web Services related JSR's that are going on now (31/67/101/109/110/155/172/181/183). Thanks, dims --- Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > > > Ok. I change my vote. > > > > +1 for xml-wsif > > +1 for org.apache.wsif.* > > Your vote for xml-wsif is one of the ones that does count, but it should be > presented on [EMAIL PROTECTED] (IMHO). My feeling is that we should > head towards the thought of a web services PMC and broach that subject to > the board when we are ready. Meanwhile, we should get the package name > right. > > - Sam Ruby > ===== Davanum Srinivas - http://xml.apache.org/~dims/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com
