Ok. I change my vote. +1 for xml-wsif +1 for org.apache.wsif.*
Thanks, dims --- Tom Jordahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am +1 to org.apache.wsif.* > +1 to xml-wsif until there is a ws-axis and ws-wsif > > I don't like the idea of putting wsif under the Axis name. > > -- > Tom Jordahl > Macromedia > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:03 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Paul Fremantle > Subject: Re: WSIF proposal > > > Hi Dims, > > I agree we don't have enough to create a WS project yet. Why not > just create new projects under XML until that condition is met? > > So I'd vote for xml-wsif and org.apache.wsif.*. I agree with Dug > that consistency is important. > > I'm planning on working on the WSDL validator this summer with > some volunteers I've picked up here in Sri Lanka. org.apache.axis.wsdl > just makes no sense to me. > > Sanjiva. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Paul Fremantle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:32 PM > Subject: Re: WSIF proposal > > > > Paul, > > > > Here's an excerpt from Dug's email: > > >> "If it has its own cvs tree then it seems odd to have "axis" in the > name. > > >> It doesn't really matter much to me as long as the names are > consistent, > > >> either they both have "axis" or neither do. > > >> -Dug" > > > > I agree with Dug's view that we need to be consistent. Since WebServices > story will not happen > > overnight...My personal view is that we can drop axis from the package > name when it happens. > > > > Thanks, > > dims > > > > --- Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Dims > > > > > > If we are going to move to an overall WebServices story, I'd rather not > name > > > the package org.apache.axis.wsif.* > > > > > > Apart from the length :-) I'd prefer that we kept a simple package name. > > > > > > Paul > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 1:00 PM > > > Subject: Re: WSIF proposal > > > > > > > > > > Sanjiva, > > > > > > > > I agree that Web Services needs its own top level project. But we > don't > > > have enough "stuff" to do > > > > so. IMHO we need more initiatives targeting various portions of the > Web > > > Services protocol stack > > > > before we can do so. Using Axis as an incubator is a step in that > > > direction. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > dims > > > > > > > > --- Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > What do you think? I proposed xml-axis-wsif, because I know that > > > there is > > > > > > some view of Axis as "brand" for apache web services. WSIF isn't > > > really an > > > > > > > > > > I don't agree that Axis is a brand for Apache Web services! Axis > > > > > as created as the Apache SOAP replacement project and I continue to > > > > > support it as the next gen Apache SOAP implementation. > > > > > > > > > > I don't think it would make any sense to say that all Apache Web > > > > > services things are named org.apache.axis.<stuff>. > > > > > > > > > > I agree with Sam that Web services needs its own top level project. > XML > > > > > is very much a part of Web services, as is a bunch of stuff from > > > Jakarta. > > > > > > > > > > Sanjiva. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ===== > > > > Davanum Srinivas - http://xml.apache.org/~dims/ > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience > > > > http://launch.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > ===== > > Davanum Srinivas - http://xml.apache.org/~dims/ > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience > > http://launch.yahoo.com ===== Davanum Srinivas - http://xml.apache.org/~dims/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com
