I think that it is time at least start approaching the subject of a Web
Services PMC.
And I'd love to see greater participation from other companies (Sun
particularly) in this community.
- James M Snell/Fresno/IBM
Web services architecture and strategy
Internet Emerging Technologies, IBM
544.9035 TIE line
559.587.1233 Office
919.486.0077 Voice Mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programming Web Services With SOAP, O'reilly & Associates, ISBN
0596000952
==
Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous. Do not be terrified,
do not be discouraged, for the Lord your God will be with you wherever you
go.
- Joshua 1:9
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: RE: WSIF proposal
Ok. I agree with the package name (org.apache.wsif.*)
Paul, Is it ok for WSIF to be under Axis (website, module name etc)? If
yes, am ok with
xml-axis-wsif. This choice will definitely save time. If you want to bring
it up on
[EMAIL PROTECTED], you can count on my support. Its upto you.
Sam,
Do you think we are ready for a "Web Services PMC" discussion? James
thinks we do.
James,
I'd be more comfortable if i see some participation from SUN given the
laundry list of Web
Services related JSR's that are going on now
(31/67/101/109/110/155/172/181/183).
Thanks,
dims
--- Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> >
> > Ok. I change my vote.
> >
> > +1 for xml-wsif
> > +1 for org.apache.wsif.*
>
> Your vote for xml-wsif is one of the ones that does count, but it should
be
> presented on [EMAIL PROTECTED] (IMHO). My feeling is that we
should
> head towards the thought of a web services PMC and broach that subject
to
> the board when we are ready. Meanwhile, we should get the package name
> right.
>
> - Sam Ruby
>
=====
Davanum Srinivas - http://xml.apache.org/~dims/
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
http://launch.yahoo.com
