Dims I'm happy with WSIF under the Axis website with the org.apache.wsif.* package name. On the other hand, based on the discussions going on, it might be worth starting the discussion with [EMAIL PROTECTED], because if WSIF is a separate project then it strengthens the WebServices ideas being bounced around. Perhaps we could progress in parallel?
Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: "Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 5:26 PM Subject: RE: WSIF proposal > Ok. I agree with the package name (org.apache.wsif.*) > > Paul, Is it ok for WSIF to be under Axis (website, module name etc)? If yes, am ok with > xml-axis-wsif. This choice will definitely save time. If you want to bring it up on > [EMAIL PROTECTED], you can count on my support. Its upto you. > > Sam, > Do you think we are ready for a "Web Services PMC" discussion? James thinks we do. > > James, > I'd be more comfortable if i see some participation from SUN given the laundry list of Web > Services related JSR's that are going on now (31/67/101/109/110/155/172/181/183). > > Thanks, > dims > > --- Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > > > > > Ok. I change my vote. > > > > > > +1 for xml-wsif > > > +1 for org.apache.wsif.* > > > > Your vote for xml-wsif is one of the ones that does count, but it should be > > presented on [EMAIL PROTECTED] (IMHO). My feeling is that we should > > head towards the thought of a web services PMC and broach that subject to > > the board when we are ready. Meanwhile, we should get the package name > > right. > > > > - Sam Ruby > > > > > ===== > Davanum Srinivas - http://xml.apache.org/~dims/ > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience > http://launch.yahoo.com
