Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > > I agree we don't have enough to create a WS project yet. Why not > just create new projects under XML until that condition is met? > > So I'd vote for xml-wsif and org.apache.wsif.*. I agree with Dug > that consistency is important. > > I'm planning on working on the WSDL validator this summer with > some volunteers I've picked up here in Sri Lanka. org.apache.axis.wsdl > just makes no sense to me.
Point of order. Votes for xml-wsif can only be made by the xml pmc, and generally such votes on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Vote for a new PMC can only be done by the board, typically on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Votes for xml-axis-* require only the approval of committers to Axis. CVS repository names can easily be changed. Package name changes have more impact. So in my opinion, it behooves us to get the package name right; meanwhile we can use the axis community as Dims has suggested to bootstrap. So, while I understand Doug's concern over consistency, I agree with Paul's proposal for cvs repository and Java package names. - Sam Ruby
