+1 on this
- James M Snell/Fresno/IBM
Web services architecture and strategy
Internet Emerging Technologies, IBM
544.9035 TIE line
559.587.1233 Office
919.486.0077 Voice Mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programming Web Services With SOAP, O'reilly & Associates, ISBN
0596000952
==
Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous. Do not be terrified,
do not be discouraged, for the Lord your God will be with you wherever you
go.
- Joshua 1:9
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Re: WSIF proposal
Ok
So I believe we are in the position of
CVS tree - xml-axis-wsif
Package - org.apache.wsif
The reasoning for the difference is the ability to go ahead with
xml-axis-wsif now.
I haven't counted votes yet, but if anyone wants to change their vote
based
on the discussion or add a vote - now is good!
Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: "Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 8:24 PM
Subject: Re: WSIF proposal
> I agree whole-heartedly with Sam. Incubate first, Proposal for
"WebServices PMC" later.
>
> Thanks,
> dims
>
> --- Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Paul Freemantle wrote:]
> > >
> > > it might
> > > be worth starting the discussion with [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > My experience is that it won't spark any additional discussion there
as
the
> > people who would be interested in the subject are also subscribed
here.
> > This also goes to the heart of why I believe that web services is
> > ultimately destined to become a separate project. So the path I would
> > recommend is to prove that it can be done by incubating the project
here,
> > and then proceed to the Apache board with a concrete proposal for a
new
> > Apache project.
> >
> > That being said, you are welcome to prove me wrong.
> >
> > - Sam Ruby
> >
>
>
> =====
> Davanum Srinivas - http://xml.apache.org/~dims/
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
> http://launch.yahoo.com
