They are working on it... http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2005/07/29/445242.aspx (last 3 paras). Molly (a visitor around here every so often [1]) is on the case from the inside... http://weblogs.asp.net/molly/ J [1] http://www.flickr.com/photos/jasoncartwright/tags/molly/ <http://www.flickr.com/photos/jasoncartwright/377686574/>
________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of vijay chopra Sent: 28 March 2007 12:35 To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk Subject: Re: [backstage] Browser Stats On 28/03/07, Jason Cartwright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I suspect you already know this, and perhaps your question is rhetorical. I'll answer it anyhow :-). Some browsers had different interpretations of the standards and render pages radically differently from each other. Testing to the standards is pointless, and will result in thousands of emails asking why IE, and it's box model, has messed up the pretty design. J Actually as far as I can tell, everyone execpt MSIE is aiming to meet the ACID 2 test: http://www.webstandards.org/action/acid2/ Admittedly firefox isn't there yet, but has it as a milestone; but IIRC Opera, Safri and Konquer all meet the test. So it's no "some browsers" it's "a browser". Unfortunately, that browser just happens to be the most widely used one, so it has to be "supported".
