At 22:16 -0700 on 11/07/2010, LuKreme wrote about Re: <i> vs <em> and
<b> vs <strong>:
On 7-Nov-2010, at 11:31, Linda wrote:
How do I prevent Tidy in BBEdit when I reflow a document from changing
all of my <i> tags to <em> and all of my <b> tags to <strong>?
You don't. <i> and <b> should not be used.
That depends. If the intent is to have the file shorter (due to the
tags being shorter) then using i/b as opposed to em/strong is
indicated.
OTOH: If the reason is to control the display of the tagged text,
then you get into the issue of em/strong displaying however the
browser feels like it wants to support these tags which may not be as
if they were i/b tags. If you use em/strong in lieu of i/b then the
only way to insure display as italic/bold is to use CSS to hit the
browser over the head with a 2x4 by defining i/b as italic/bold in
lieu of the Browser's default display choice.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
<http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en>
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem,
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit>
