>regarding filesize, i think it can be assumed, and further it really >has nothing to do with the OS. what i am saying is that when SBS looks >for first alphabetical filename thats no different than looking for >biggest filesize. its the same "additional logic" already, only >filesize would be smarter than alphabetical. > Filesize is irrelevant. Large artwork stored in jpg with high compression could be a smaller size than a smaller image with low compression. Or, images stored in different formats, etc.
>in other words, SBS already is doing the alphabetical thing, i am >merely suggesting a one for one swap with a different/better method. > My point is that it is not better. >than due to greatest hits logic they would all get their own art >anyway, whatever is in (or missing in) each respective folder. > Artwork is currently only associated with an album, so if songs are in the same or different folders, only one artwork file can be associated with the album. So when it's said to take the first file alphabetically, I assume that it would be sorted for the full path to the files. _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
