I suspect DOTs criticism of the cameras expense is a ploy to ensure that the revenue generated by the cameras is sent right to the DOT so they can build more bigger freeways.
I say we turn the "the expense of not assigning demerit points for red-light camera violations" argument on its head and instead solve the expense problem by not waving demerit points for running a red light in front of a camera. Red light running is red light running - it is the behavior that should determine the need for the demerit points, not the method of detecting poor behavior. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Drake Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 8:36 AM To: Bikies Subject: [Bikies] Bill for Allowing Cameras to Cite Red Light Runners [snip] Safety apparently isn't the DOT's main concern. According the article below DOT admits that the program would improve safety, but appose it due the expense. [snip] _______________________________________________ Bikies mailing list [email protected] http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies
