Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> --- Em sex, 19/10/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
>> De: Bruce Dubbs
>> Assunto: [blfs-dev] iced tea
>> Para: "BLFS Development List"
>> Data: Sexta-feira, 19 de Outubro de 2012, 14:37
>> I've been looking at updating iced
>> tea.
>> <rant> I'm into problems because the make files have
>> hard coded paths
>> into make files.  /usr/bin/head (which is in /bin) and
>> /bin/touch (which
>> is in /usr/bin/touch).  What are these guys
>> thinking?  why can't they
>> use the PATH? </rant>
>> Has anyone else seen/solved this problem.  I'm
>> addressing it right now
>> with symlinks.
> In previous version, I used icedtea-2.3.2-fixed_paths-1.patch (took previous, 
> in anduin, and renamed)

It looks like DJ did address the problem.  I was trying to run without 
patches as an initial try.  My original rant with the developers 
remains.  Why can't they use either PATH or `which prg-name`?

Right now, it's still building.

> BTW, last time I talked about attitude, was never meant a negative
> sense, I liked that (positive) attitude. Apologies if it seemed
> otherwise.

What are you talking about?

   -- Bruce
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to