Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > --- Em sex, 19/10/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > >> De: Bruce Dubbs >> Assunto: [blfs-dev] iced tea >> Para: "BLFS Development List" >> Data: Sexta-feira, 19 de Outubro de 2012, 14:37 >> I've been looking at updating iced >> tea. >> >> <rant> I'm into problems because the make files have >> hard coded paths >> into make files. /usr/bin/head (which is in /bin) and >> /bin/touch (which >> is in /usr/bin/touch). What are these guys >> thinking? why can't they >> use the PATH? </rant> >> >> Has anyone else seen/solved this problem. I'm >> addressing it right now >> with symlinks. > > In previous version, I used icedtea-2.3.2-fixed_paths-1.patch (took previous, > in anduin, and renamed)
It looks like DJ did address the problem. I was trying to run without patches as an initial try. My original rant with the developers remains. Why can't they use either PATH or `which prg-name`? Right now, it's still building. > BTW, last time I talked about attitude, was never meant a negative > sense, I liked that (positive) attitude. Apologies if it seemed > otherwise. What are you talking about? -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
