DJ Lucas wrote: >> BTW, what do we call this version. It's icedtea-2.3.3, but the build says: >> >> java version "1.7.0_0" >> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0-b36) >> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.2-b09, mixed mode) >> >> Right now we are calling the current version OpenJDK-1.7.0.5, but the >> most recent version does not seem to fall into that naming convention.
> Odd...it should be pulling that value from the OpenJDK version (which > should already match the closed version in git). Upstream must have > broken that somehow. Nothing on distro-pkg-dev list yet. The earlier post was before the final executable was done. Now I have: $ openjdk.build/j2sdk-image/bin/javac -version javac 1.7.0_09 $ openjdk.build/j2sdk-image/bin/java -version java version "1.7.0_09" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea7 2.3.3) (Linux From Scratch build 1.7.0_09-b30) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.2-b09, mixed mode) The question still remains, what should we call the destination directory. What we have in the book is /opt/OpenJDK-1.7.0.5: $ /opt/OpenJDK-1.7.0.5-bin/bin/javac -version javac 1.7.0_04 $ /opt/OpenJDK-1.7.0.5-bin/bin/java -version java version "1.7.0_04-icedtea" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea7 2.2) (linux-gnu build 1.7.0_04-icedtea-b21) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.0-b21, mixed mode) So do we just call it 'OpenJDK-1.7.0.9' ? -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
