> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 20:04:32 +0000 > From: Ken Moffat <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg bitmap fonts - deprecate them > > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 01:46:42PM +0000, akhiezer wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 13:45:09 +0000 > > > From: [email protected] (akhiezer) > > > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg bitmap fonts - deprecate them > > > > > First, thanks for taking the time to review this. I'll reply to all > your poi nts, event ually. > > > > --- BOOK-r18030/packages.ent 2016-12-05 00:16:59.916891130 +0000 > > > > +++ BOOK-deprecate/packages.ent 2016-12-06 13:10:34.135075775 +0000 > > > > @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ > > > > > > > > <!-- Part VI --> > > > > <!-- Chapter 24 --> <!-- stable lt .90 > > > > micro version --> > > > > -<!ENTITY xorg-version "7.7"> <!-- applies to all > > > > xorg packages --> > > > > +<!ENTITY xorg-version "7"> <!-- applies to all > > > > xorg packages --> > > > > > > > > > Shurely not? Instead, keep that xorg-version ENTITY with the accurate > > > version ('7.7'/&c); and just do a manual-override ('7') in the relevant > > > page titles/&c; or define a related xorg-version-main ENTITY ('7') > > > > > > s/main/major/ > > > > I see Bruce and DJ have already commented. My opinion was that 7.7 > came out in April 2012 and the overall version has not changed since > then. Specifically, changes to the parts now happen irregularly. > > Bruce suggested removing the 7.7, I went with 'cut it down to just > 7' after I saw it was fro m a version entity - because we reference > the major version in text and in the names of book pages and wiki > pages. > > For the moment I cannot see any reason why keeping the 7.7 entity > would be useful. >
If just using '7', then entity would (much-)more-correctly be 'xorg-version-major' . akh -- -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
