Having done quite a bit of work n virtualized environments the rule of thumb that works is that when t comes to Windows make sure you have a license for every incident that you are running. When it comes to JFW if you need to have multiple JFW incidents running at the same time consider buying the network version of JFW, it makes life much, much easier. Frank
-----Original Message----- From: blind-computing-boun...@jaws-users.com [mailto:blind-computing-boun...@jaws-users.com] On Behalf Of Jacob Kruger Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 7:03 PM To: blind-computing@jaws-users.com Subject: Re: [Blind-Computing] virtual machine Makes sense. I think I would generally just run a virtual version of jaws in 40 minute mode etc., but even without actually allowing an installation of windows to carry out it's online activation, you'd still need to enter a registration key during installation, and that would possibly toggle something to do with your licence at some stage. Honestly though, for now, the only virtual machine have tried out much is vinux, and there's not such an issue there, but I did want to try out things like windows 95 etc. to try out versions of narrator I have that are meant to work on them, but suppose that also negates this joint licence issue as such. Stay well Jacob Kruger Blind Biker Skype: BlindZA '...fate had broken his body, but not his spirit...' ----- Original Message ----- From: "Donald Marang" <donald.mar...@gmail.com> To: <blind-computing@jaws-users.com> Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 1:42 AM Subject: Re: [Blind-Computing] virtual machine > Good question! According to my attempts to get answers from Microsoft, > Apple and Freedom Scientific. The answer from Apple is simple. Anyone > attempting to run their Operating System on any hardware that is not from > Apple will be prosecuted! the response from the other two depend on who > you ask, and what day it is. Microsoft clearly requires anyone running > Windows in a Virtual Machine on a Mac or Linux platform must buy a > separate license for that installation. Microsoft used to be clear that a > license was needed for each virtual machine. This did not get much push > back until lately when Microsoft who now wants to sell virtualization to > consumers. I understandMicrosoft's view of licensing Virtual Machines on > a computer running the same OS, or even a version previously updated to > the current version has relaxed a bit. However, there are actually > provisions in the Windows 7 license that are very strict and make > ffollowing official Microsoft on screen instructions during installation > illegal! For instance, the way the licence is written, it is not legal to > create a dual oot system that can boot both the 32 bit and 64 bit versions > of Windows 7! However, any technical person at Microsoft will say it is > perfectly legitimate. Currently installing and authorizing JAWS in a > Virtual Machine will use up aa license key! Everyone I talked to at > Freedom Scientific so far think that would be acceptable. I have not > pushed it yet to the point where I needed to talk to a person to add more > keys, so I do not know how they would handle that. I have considered a > dongle version of JAWS, which should automatically authorize as many > Virtual Machines as you like. Since I have not tried this, I have no idea > if this has issues like the host falling back to demo mode if you spend > too much time in the Virtual Machine with the USB dongle attached. > > It sure makes open solutions like Linux and NVDA look great, since these > issues go away! > > Don Marang > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Jacob Kruger" <jac...@mailzone.co.za> > Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 3:30 PM > To: <blind-computing@jaws-users.com> > Subject: Re: [Blind-Computing] virtual machine > >> Along the lines of that, if I just wanted a clean, test instance of my >> current operating system - does it count as a licence issue if I install >> it on a virtual machine that runs within my normally used instance of the >> same licenced installation? >> >> In other words, while I would be making use of 2 copies of the same >> licence, it would however be on the same physical machine. >> >> Suppose it might actually cause validation issues if they were both >> online at the same time as well. >> >> Not too important/relevant as such, but just wondering. >> >> Stay well >> >> Jacob Kruger >> Blind Biker >> Skype: BlindZA >> '...fate had broken his body, but not his spirit...' >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Frank Ventura" <frank.vent...@littlebreezes.com> >> To: <blind-computing@jaws-users.com> >> Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 5:05 PM >> Subject: Re: [Blind-Computing] virtual machine >> >> >>>A virtual machine is just that another machine. You will need to buy an >>> unused copy of the retail version of XP (try EBay) and install it into >>> a newly created virtual machine. >>> Frank Ventura >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: blind-computing-boun...@jaws-users.com >>> [mailto:blind-computing-boun...@jaws-users.com] On Behalf Of Kevin >>> Andrews >>> Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 2:42 PM >>> To: blind-computing >>> Subject: [Blind-Computing] virtual machine >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was wondering if it would be possible to obtain a Windows XP virtual >>> machine. I already have VMware player installed. I did some browsing on >>> the Internet, but it looks like I need to insert my Windows XP cd, which >>> I don't have Windows xp. Isn't the purpose of a vm is so you can run it >>> without a cd? >>> >>> If anyone could direct to any links on the WEB where I may be able to >>> download a virtual machine, either Windows XP home or pro, that would be >>> much appreciated. >>> >>> Thank you. >>> For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit: >>> http://www.jaws-users.com/help/ >>> >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >>> Version: 8.5.435 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2696 - Release Date: 02/20/10 >>> 07:34:00 >>> >>> For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit: >>> http://www.jaws-users.com/help/ >>> >>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus >>> signature database 4883 (20100220) __________ >>> >>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. >>> >>> http://www.eset.com >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus >> signature database 4883 (20100220) __________ >> >> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. >> >> http://www.eset.com >> >> >> >> >> For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit: >> http://www.jaws-users.com/help/ > > > For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit: > http://www.jaws-users.com/help/ > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 4883 (20100220) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4883 (20100220) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit: http://www.jaws-users.com/help/ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.435 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2699 - Release Date: 02/20/10 07:34:00 For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit: http://www.jaws-users.com/help/
