the so called dangers of it don't bother me right now. Hell it's at
least a few years off before it's as good as we might want it anyways.
I am a risk taker anyways.

On 3/21/19, marcio via Groups.Io <marcinhorj21=yahoo.com...@groups.io> wrote:
> Shaun,
> Again you are so right on all of your just said!
> Like I said, whenever I talk about it, I make sure to also talk about
> how dangerous this can be and it should be considered before anything else.
> Now, well, what I wouldn't give to have the same experience you had with
> the headset :)
>
> Cheers,
> Marcio
> AKA /Starboy/
>
>
> Follow or add me on Facebook <https://facebook.com/firirinfonfon>
>
> Em 21/03/2019 07:30, Shaun Everiss escreveu:
>>
>> Well startrek did have the safety systems in their holodecks but even
>> then.
>>
>> If a reality was to merge with a gaming one, there would have to be
>> differences betwene actual real life or actual reality.
>>
>> Things like well a day of game life would be an hour or less of real
>> life could be a minute, and if you got adicted hmmm all sorts of issues.
>>
>> To be honest, even if vr would become a reality, its doubtfull that
>> most of us would be able to afford it on a large scale.
>>
>> I got close to it during one of my research studdies, I had a gaming
>> 3d headset, and used an iphone to play a game, I closed my eyes, the
>> place was darkened, and I was able to enter some sort of different
>> reality even though I never actually moved from my location.
>>
>> After it was all over, I asked exactly how much for someone like me to
>> do it again for myself.
>>
>> You would need a computer or iphone for that to work.
>>
>> However the cost of the set alone bulky that it was would cost me 500
>> us +.
>>
>> While I could afford it, thats still a lot of cash, Now I can probably
>> afford 1-200 bucks at a stretch, but thats a lot so I only spend more
>> than that if I need something.
>>
>> Whenever I have had to really spend a huge amount, upgrading voices,
>> tech, etc like I did this year with the help of my family, it
>> basically means that my spend cash for anything huge is gone for at
>> least 6 months or so.
>>
>> Assuming nothing like drives fail or something important happens I can
>> try again.
>>
>> But there are always other things to get.
>>
>> Due to the fact I have fibre, I will eventually need a new router for
>> things to run right.
>>
>> While the 500 dollar router is an isp one and is therefore free to me,
>> the 100 or so bucks for the upgrade of the extender is something I
>> need to get.
>>
>> I am not sure if I will get it but I may get an external firewall box
>> which may cost 200 bucks.
>>
>> I spent 500 alone on upgrades I needed to get this year alone for the
>> systems, and well, a set well who knows.
>>
>> Its not on the top of my priorities.
>>
>> Now I have sets similar to what I tested but not in that class but
>> they work.
>>
>> If I get through this year and don't need to cough up cash for
>> something that fails or something in my offline life that needs
>> fixing, then the next bit of cash I need to spend is to upgrade the
>> almost dead server that handles some things that are mostly transfered
>> to other places.
>>
>> And there are other projects I want to get at.
>>
>> I have to many sets to afford the space for more in any case.
>>
>> Space is the issue for some stuff.
>>
>> As for an actual vr set, I don't know if its worth it.
>>
>> For the blind high quality headphones that fit over the ear are enough.
>>
>> Even if all the things with vr actually worked, you would a need a way
>> to bail out if an emergency happened etc.
>>
>> And while I can get carried away now, I can't do it while people are
>> out of the house in fact a lot of the time I don't use the headset
>> because of this.
>>
>> Cutting out all sences can be dangerous.
>>
>> Look at pokemon go.
>>
>> That was an orgmented reality game.
>>
>> True, there was a craze, some people got really into the spirrit of it.
>>
>> But while there were even themed stores and stuff in real life, the
>> fact was that there were issues which would make the user think twice
>> about getting carried away with something that could sporn objects
>> anywhere using the real world for objects and the like.
>>
>> There are gaming arieas in random places, war zones, houses, forbidden
>> places, some rumors.
>>
>> People have gone to arieas in game that were in the middle of roads,
>> and have gotten run over.
>>
>> People have gone into houses to play because there was an ariea in the
>> phone, and got shot.
>>
>> Its reported north corria has some between them and south and well
>> there are military bases with gaming arieas in them.
>>
>> People have lost jobs, and real lives over orgmented reality and thats
>> only going to get worse.
>>
>> There are warnings that people live in their phones even to the point
>> that married couples can't leave their phones, kids and adults alike.
>>
>> For a more recent game, think fortnight.
>>
>> Children have got so addicted they will play for days on end, not eat,
>> sleep, go to school, they will get stuck in the game.
>>
>> My question to you then is, should we even start.
>>
>> This is not real vr just yet, but there is a lot of evidence that even
>> orgmented psudo reality if not used right is quite dangerous.
>>
>> This excludes anyone that wants to do malicious things in it.
>>
>> I mean a vr virus could exist, vr chrimes, etc.
>>
>> We allready have the net.
>>
>> The neet is like the real world almost.
>>
>> We try to control it and barely can do so.
>>
>> We do have laws for some stuff, but most of us only stay on the edge
>> of the net world.
>>
>> The dark web is in the middle of it, and its like mobville, a lot of
>> bad stuff happens online a lot more than we can actually handle right
>> now.
>>
>> While we have rules inforcing laws accross borders is a challenge.
>>
>> Unless you are like china or other countries that sensor everything
>> and kill anyone that goes against anything they think is bad.
>>
>> Even then, you can't really control the net, its just to big.
>>
>> If we can't control the net well barely control it, we can't control vr.
>>
>> There are to many security breaches netwide to call the net a safe
>> place to live in.
>>
>> Now we do, but thats another story.
>>
>> We are not ready for vr, and the net is getting big fast.
>>
>> They say ai will destroy us, I suspect that we aren't ready for that
>> either.
>>
>> The only reason most of us aren
>>
>> 't dead yet is probably because we don't know half of what is going on
>> online we just do whatever is needed.
>>
>> Once we control the world, and the net and our reality first then we
>> can decide on what is next.
>>
>> We are going to get into a situation where barely control will be no
>> control, and well you loose control of everything and boom its all over.
>>
>> We barely have control to what you would concidder full control, we
>> know enough but not enough at the same time.
>>
>> Right now it all looks cool, but no one has thought about later just yet.
>>
>>
>> On 21/03/2019 9:26 PM, marcio via Groups.Io wrote:
>>> Shaun,
>>> Of course you are right!
>>> The idea of merging these two things into only one would be very
>>> dangerous.
>>> That's why, whenever this subject come in, I make sure to say that if
>>> we ever could get to that point, then it would have to be done very,
>>> very carefully, considering most (if not all) of the possible scenarios.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Marcio AKA /Starboy/
>>> Follow or add me on Facebook <https://facebook.com/firirinfonfon>
>>>
>>> Em 21/03/2019 05:16, Shaun Everiss escreveu:
>>>>
>>>> I wouldn't to be honest.
>>>>
>>>> Firstly, look at the matrix.
>>>>
>>>> Then read better than life red dwarf book and you would find several
>>>> reasons why completely merging realities just isn't a good idea.
>>>>
>>>> Merging reality with the real world is fine as long as you can get
>>>> out again.
>>>>
>>>> For me gaming is a way to get away from reality, I know people that
>>>> can get adicted to the real thing but I do also know if I need to
>>>> stop I can get up out of my chair and just do it.
>>>>
>>>> Games are games, reality is reality.
>>>>
>>>> If you read all the scifi books and movies about, the general ting
>>>> is yes you can, but then its really not a good idea to try to mess
>>>> with that.
>>>>
>>>> Even if you could, the expence of the gear is a big drawback.
>>>>
>>>> As far as you can do with audio then fine, but the rest I don't know.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 21/03/2019 8:23 PM, marcio via Groups.Io wrote:
>>>>> Well, it must have someone interested in all of this we have to talk!
>>>>> It's just a matter of look for the right person.
>>>>> Maybe if we could spread about this list, this subject would very
>>>>> well attract some attention of someone on this :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Marcio AKA /Starboy/
>>>>> Follow or add me on Facebook <https://facebook.com/firirinfonfon>
>>>>>
>>>>> Em 20/03/2019 16:03, Ron Kolesar escreveu:
>>>>>> I also agree on that point.
>>>>>> But who to get a hold of to tell them our stories?
>>>>>> Ron
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message----- From: Lenron
>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 11:30
>>>>>> To: blind-gamers@groups.io
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [blind-gamers] food for thought: How far you would go
>>>>>> as to merging your reality with the gaming one?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It would be cool if we could talk to a company that was working on
>>>>>> VR,
>>>>>> so that accessibility and things are not an after thought. You know
>>>>>> getting in on the ground floor.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/19/19, marcio via Groups.Io
>>>>>> <marcinhorj21=yahoo.com...@groups.io> wrote:
>>>>>>> Lenron,
>>>>>>> This could be a good solution as well. One I hadn't thought of,
>>>>>>> by the way.
>>>>>>> See, guys, there are some interesting ideas! I'm thinking, maybe
>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>> is someone we can talk with to discuss these ideas and perhaps
>>>>>>> turn them
>>>>>>> (or at least some of them) into reality?
>>>>>>> What you guys think about it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Marcio
>>>>>>> AKA /Starboy/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Follow or add me on Facebook <https://facebook.com/firirinfonfon>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Em 19/03/2019 14:31, Lenron escreveu:
>>>>>>>> I am willing to bet you could choose your sensory input levels
>>>>>>>> maybe.
>>>>>>>> Like maybe you would only feel 20 percent of the pain or
>>>>>>>> something on
>>>>>>>> easy mode.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 3/19/19, marcio via Groups.Io
>>>>>>>> <marcinhorj21=yahoo.com...@groups.io>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Interesting point, Devin!
>>>>>>>>> Your point seem to be in accordance with Luke's one.
>>>>>>>>> However, as we (John - I think - and I have said), just because
>>>>>>>>> we're
>>>>>>>>> blind in real life, doesn't mean we have/need to be when
>>>>>>>>> playing, after
>>>>>>>>> all, it's a game.
>>>>>>>>> Whatever road, though, would bring us a lot of fun. I imagine
>>>>>>>>> the other
>>>>>>>>> players would actually be surprised if they ever see a person
>>>>>>>>> with a
>>>>>>>>> cane among them. Lol
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>> Marcio
>>>>>>>>> AKA /Starboy/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Follow or add me on Facebook <https://facebook.com/firirinfonfon>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Em 19/03/2019 09:58, Devin Prater escreveu:
>>>>>>>>>> I really think Virtual reality would be great for learning to use
>>>>>>>>>> sensory substitution things, like the vOICe, at
>>>>>>>>>> seeingwithsound.com
>>>>>>>>>> <http://seeingwithsound.com>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Besides that though, being able to see in a VR game would be
>>>>>>>>>> really
>>>>>>>>>> hard to simulate for a blind person, unless the things we use,
>>>>>>>>>> like a
>>>>>>>>>> virtual cane and such, were invissible for other players. And
>>>>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>>>>> then, we'd be slower than others, just by the fact that we'd
>>>>>>>>>> have more
>>>>>>>>>> info to take in, we'd have to physically explore our
>>>>>>>>>> enviornment with
>>>>>>>>>> the cane rather than just turn the head to look around, and,
>>>>>>>>>> so things
>>>>>>>>>> wouldn't be equal. However, this doesn't negate how much fun we'd
>>>>>>>>>> have, just like current video games. Shoot, I could play Dissidia
>>>>>>>>>> Final Fantasy for hours, using OCR of course, but its still
>>>>>>>>>> fun as
>>>>>>>>>> heck.
>>>>>>>>>> Devin Prater
>>>>>>>>>> sent from Gmail.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 7:34 AM marcio via Groups.Io
>>>>>>>>>> <marcinhorj21=yahoo.com...@groups.io
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:yahoo.com...@groups.io>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>      Hmm, I think you're right, I hadn't considered it all.
>>>>>>>>>>      But still (not that it's possible for now), what if
>>>>>>>>>> someday they
>>>>>>>>>>      could develop a kind of technology capable of make you
>>>>>>>>>> feel this
>>>>>>>>>>      sensation and forget about it right away?
>>>>>>>>>>      Of course I don't know how it could be done but I tell
>>>>>>>>>> you, when
>>>>>>>>>>      it comes to technology, I won't doubt anything, not anymore.
>>>>>>>>>>      Even though, your point is  still valid. Before accepting
>>>>>>>>>> such
>>>>>>>>>>      complex concept, one needs to think of the implications
>>>>>>>>>> it would
>>>>>>>>>>      carry along, of course, with the good things.
>>>>>>>>>>      A long way to go, isn't it?
>>>>>>>>>>      Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>      Marcio AKA /Starboy/
>>>>>>>>>>      Follow or add me on Facebook
>>>>>>>>>> <https://facebook.com/firirinfonfon>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>      Em 19/03/2019 09:20, john escreveu:
>>>>>>>>>>>      Here's the thing: just because a sensation was created
>>>>>>>>>>> by a game,
>>>>>>>>>>>      doesn't mean you didn't experience that sensation. If
>>>>>>>>>>> games got
>>>>>>>>>>>      realistic enough that they could fully simulate reality
>>>>>>>>>>> and you
>>>>>>>>>>>      faceplanted the sidewalk, it doesn't matter that your
>>>>>>>>>>> nose isn't
>>>>>>>>>>>      broken in real life, you'll still experience what it
>>>>>>>>>>> would be
>>>>>>>>>>>      like, and you'll remember that experience.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>      So yeah, when you quit the game (presumably almost
>>>>>>>>>>> immediately
>>>>>>>>>>>      because broken bones hurt) you'll be back in the "real"
>>>>>>>>>>> reality
>>>>>>>>>>>      and your nose won't be broken anymore, but you'll still
>>>>>>>>>>> remember
>>>>>>>>>>>      what it felt like, and that's where a lot of trauma
>>>>>>>>>>> comes from.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>      You've probably paid someone to mutilate your body
>>>>>>>>>>> before (ever
>>>>>>>>>>>      had teeth pulled?), but you (hopefully) don't remember
>>>>>>>>>>> it and
>>>>>>>>>>>      have no lasting impact, because you were asleep for the
>>>>>>>>>>> process,
>>>>>>>>>>>      and didn't experience any of it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>      So in short - just because it's artificially created
>>>>>>>>>>> sensation
>>>>>>>>>>>      doesn't mean it's not sensation, and that's where true
>>>>>>>>>>> VR gets
>>>>>>>>>>>      terrifying (because it doesn't always have to be in the
>>>>>>>>>>> context
>>>>>>>>>>>      of a game you play willingly).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>      *From:* marcio via Groups.Io
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:marcinhorj21=yahoo.com...@groups.io>
>>>>>>>>>>>      *Sent:* Monday, March 18, 2019 23:43
>>>>>>>>>>>      *To:* blind-gamers@groups.io
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:blind-gamers@groups.io>
>>>>>>>>>>>      *Subject:* Re: [blind-gamers] food for thought: How far
>>>>>>>>>>> you would
>>>>>>>>>>>      go as to merging your reality with the gaming one?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>      I agree. But it's still about gaming, so, even if you were
>>>>>>>>>>>      confused with the two realities, you always would have
>>>>>>>>>>> the "exit
>>>>>>>>>>>      door".
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>      Some experiences, of course, wouldn't be that cool to
>>>>>>>>>>> have :) but
>>>>>>>>>>>      well, apart from the feelings, sensation, it's nothing
>>>>>>>>>>> more than
>>>>>>>>>>>      a game :)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>      Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>      Marcio AKA /Starboy/
>>>>>>>>>>>      Follow or add me on Facebook
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://facebook.com/firirinfonfon>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>      Em 18/03/2019 08:12, john escreveu:
>>>>>>>>>>>>      This would be awesome, depending on the game. Game
>>>>>>>>>>>> worlds can be
>>>>>>>>>>>>      a lot harsher than reality, and as incredible as it
>>>>>>>>>>>> might be to
>>>>>>>>>>>>      experience some of them, others... not so much.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      *From:* marcio via Groups.Io
>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:marcinhorj21=yahoo.com...@groups.io>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      *Sent:* Sunday, March 17, 2019 19:32
>>>>>>>>>>>>      *To:* blind-gamers@groups.io
>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:blind-gamers@groups.io>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      *Subject:* [blind-gamers] food for thought: How far you
>>>>>>>>>>>> would go
>>>>>>>>>>>>      as to merging your reality with the gaming one?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      Hello folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      Just now I was randomly chatting with one person and
>>>>>>>>>>>> then the
>>>>>>>>>>>>      "virtual reality" subject matter came up.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      So was wondering, what you guys think about this
>>>>>>>>>>>> concept? How
>>>>>>>>>>>>      far you would go with it and why?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      Do you have any interest into a more complex concept
>>>>>>>>>>>> behind this
>>>>>>>>>>>>      all which maybe could even confuse you as to what's
>>>>>>>>>>>> your reality
>>>>>>>>>>>>      and what's the gaming one?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      Thoughts are welcome :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      --
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>      Marcio AKA /Starboy/
>>>>>>>>>>>>      Follow or add me on Facebook
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://facebook.com/firirinfonfon>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> 
>
>


-- 
Lenron Brown
Cell: 985-271-2832
Skype: ron.brown762

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#120439): https://groups.io/g/blind-gamers/message/120439
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/30468776/21656
Group Owner: blind-gamers+ow...@groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/blind-gamers/leave/607459/1071380848/xyzzy  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to