BM_discussion
http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion
[email protected]

Today's topics:

* Dr Rebello: Lopsided health care policy goes against human rights. - 1 
messages, 1 author
 
http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion/browse_thread/thread/ee2d60383a14e7e8
* Medical Corruption: Bayer sold HIV tainted meds to Asian countries. - 1 
messages, 1 author
 
http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion/browse_thread/thread/ef39f19a3559e332

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Dr Rebello: Lopsided health care policy goes against human rights.
http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion/browse_thread/thread/ee2d60383a14e7e8
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, Jun 10 2006 8:13 am 
From: Jagannath Chatterjee  

To 
The Editor 
Down to Earth 
Delhi 110 062 June 05, 2005 

Lopsided health care policy and half-baked health movement. 

Dear Madam, 

Apropos your latest issue (May 31, 2005) :- the article "wisdom roots" was a 
very interesting piece on traditional healers in Rajasthan. One rarely gets to 
read such reports these days. As regards the interview with David Frawley, 
Director of American Institute of Vedic Studies, Down to Earth may consider 
going deeper into the status, problems and attitudes towards 
indigenous/alternative systems of medicine in India. 

While the world over (Europe and US in particular), people are resorting to 
Ayurveda and Indigenous medicines, we Indians are failing to take into account 
Indigenous medicine for raising the standard of health of the people. India 
still gives step-motherly treatment to traditional/indigenous/alternative 
medicine even though it recognises Ayurveda, Homeopathy, Naturopathy, Unani, 
Siddha. 

One may question as to how many Indigenous/Alternative medicine training 
institutes, research centres and hospitals have been established by the 
government as compared to Allopathic system? Has anybody heard of a municipal 
government hospital exclusively for indigenous medicine or a college to train 
barefoot doctors? Shouldn’t we learn from China, which has always kept alive 
and proudly promoted its effective Acupuncture treatment? 

But no, we have created a multi-billion health industry and promoted hospitals 
indulging in health tourism but do not release grants for upgrading Primary 
Health Centres in villages and cant pay our rural health workers a living wage. 
We have doctors of Homeopathy, Ayurveda coming to treat Parliamentarians (see 
MP Parliament directory "services" section) at government expense, but fail to 
provide these treatments through government hospitals to the general 
population. 

World over, the lobby of drug industry is so strong that Indigenous systems of 
medicine is labeled quackery and even governments lobbied to deny these 
research funds. It is the multi-billion drug industry that decides our health. 
Not for nothing the finance ministry of India decides the drug policy and not 
the health ministry. 

As an activist one knows that governments dance to the tune of lobbies and 
mafias (be it pharmaceutical, arms, food etc) but it becomes really disturbing 
when some NGOs and movements such as Jan Swasthya Abhiyan, Right to Cheap 
Medicine campaign, or centres for human rights holding public tribunals on 
health lay emphasis on delivery of Allopathy medicines to rural people and 
forget cheaper, safer Indigenous medicine. 

Right to health interpreted as right to life (Article 21, COI) in CERC vs Union 
of India by Supreme Court remains mere rhetoric if it doesn’t include the right 
to choose one’s system of health care. 

David Frawley’s statement that Ayurveda has no lobby is true for all 
indigenous/alternative systems of medicine more in India than in the US. Hence 
it is very important that NGOs, Abhiyans and citizens focus their 
attention/campaign on indigenous system of medicine which are far cheaper, 
safer, effective and through which we can achieve health for all. Lobbying and 
compelling governments to provide allopathic medicines in the name of right to 
health is a pseudo and half-baked movement. 

Yours frankly 

Ronald L. Rebello 
Human Rights Activist 

28 Sunrise (552), Samta Nagar 
Kandivali (East), Mumbai 400 101 


    "Our ideal is not the spirituality that withdraws from life but the 
conquest of life by the power of the spirit." -  Aurobindo.




 __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 




==============================================================================
TOPIC: Medical Corruption: Bayer sold HIV tainted meds to Asian countries.
http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion/browse_thread/thread/ef39f19a3559e332
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 11 2006 2:14 am 
From: Jagannath Chatterjee  

Dear Members,
   
  I have been warning against the use of serum based vaccines and medicines. 
These products are almost always contaminated and carry the risk of spreading 
dangerous diseases. Medical insiders know that uncontaminated serum is a 
contradiction in terms. Serum can only be "relatively pure", whatever that 
means. The risk of genetic contamination is 100% as we do not screen the serum 
for defective genes. 
   
  Now we have a very large drug MNC showing no regrets about passing on HIV to 
patients in Asia through a serum based medication.
   
  Regards,
  Jagannath.
   
   
   
  June 10, 2006 8:31pm 

 http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/05/22/health/main555154.shtml

Bayer Sold HIV-Risky Meds

FRANKFURT, Germany, May 22, 2003

 (AP)


Quote


"Decisions made nearly two decades ago were based on the best 
scientific information of the time and were consistent with the regulations in 
place. They cannot be judged on the information available today."
Bayer AG


(AP) Chemical and drug maker Bayer AG said Thursday it acted 
"responsibly, ethically and humanely" during the 1980s in selling a 
blood-clotting product that stopped potentially fatal bleeding in hemophiliacs 
but 
was linked to the risk of HIV infection. 

The company's statement was in response to a New York Times report that 
it sold millions of dollars worth of an older version of the medication 
in Latin America and Asia while marketing a newer, safer product in the 
United States and Europe. 

Bayer division Cutter Biological continued selling old stocks of the 
medicine for more than a year after it introduced a version in February 
1984 that was heat-treated to kill HIV, according to documents obtained 
by the Times. 

The medicine, called Factor VIII concentrate, can stop or prevent 
potentially fatal bleeding in people with hemophilia, a genetic condition 
that prevents blood from clotting normally. 

Early in the AIDS epidemic, the medicine was made using plasma from 
10,000 or more donors. There was not yet a screening test for HIV, the 
virus that causes AIDS, so even a small number of HIV-positive donors 
could taint a large pool of plasma recipients. 

As a result, thousands of hemophiliacs became infected with HIV. Bayer 
and three other companies that made the concentrate have paid about 
$600 million to settle more than 15 years of lawsuits accusing them of 
making a dangerous product, the newspaper said. 

The Times said at least 100 hemophiliacs in Hong Kong and Taiwan alone 
contracted AIDS after using the older product, and that many have since 
died. Li Wei-chun said her son, who died in 1996 at the age of 23, was 
among the victims. 

"They did not care about the lives in Asia," she said. "It was racial 
discrimination." 

Cutter also sold the older medicine in Argentina, Indonesia, Japan, 
Malaysia, and Singapore after February 1984, according to the documents. 
The newspaper said Cutter shipped more than 100,000 vials of unheated 
concentrate, worth more than $4 million, after it began selling the safer 
product. 

The sales continued partly because of Cutter's desire to deplete stocks 
of the older medicine, and partly because of fixed-price contracts, for 
which the company believed the older product would be cheaper to make, 
the newspaper said. 

In March 1983, the federal Centers for Disease Control warned that 
blood products appeared responsible for AIDS among hemophiliacs. Three 
months later, Cutter sent a letter to distributors in nearly two dozen 
nations saying that AIDS was "the center of irrational response in many 
countries." 

In late 1984, as Hong Kong hemophiliacs began testing positive for HIV, 
some doctors wondered whether Cutter was sending "AIDS-tainted" 
medicine into less-developed nations. 

But the company assured its distributor that the unheated product posed 
"no severe hazard" and was the "same fine product we have supplied for 
years." 

In May 1985, Dr. Harry M. Meyer Jr., the Food and Drug Administration's 
blood-products official, called the companies to a meeting, believing 
they had broken an agreement to stop selling the older medicine, the 
Times said. But Meyer decided to handle the matter quietly instead of 
notifying the public, the newspaper said. 



By David McHugh
©MMIII, The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may 
not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.





    "Our ideal is not the spirituality that withdraws from life but the 
conquest of life by the power of the spirit." -  Aurobindo.




 __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 



==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BM_discussion"
group.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected] or visit 
http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion/subscribe

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com

Reply via email to