The BMW UUC Digest 
Volume 4 : Issue 2 : "text" Format

Messages in this Issue:
  Re: 97 Z3 heat issue
  Re: Here's one for you folks that still cling to the K&N filter myth
  Re: Here's one for you folks that still cling to the K&N filter myth
  Re: Here's one for you folks that still cling to the K&N filter myth
  Re: Here's one for you folks that still cling to the K&N filter myth
  Re: Here's one for you folks that still cling to the K&N filter myth
  Re: Here's one for you folks that still cling to the
  Re: Here's one for you folks that still cling to the K&N filter myth
  Re: Here's one for you folks that still cling to the K&N filter myth
  Re: Here's one for you folks that still cling to the  K&N
  Re: Here's one for you folks that still cling to the  K&N
  Remembering Michel Potheau
  Re: Remembering Michel Potheau
  Re: Remembering Michel Potheau
  German seat leather source 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 19:37:45 +0000
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: 97 Z3 heat issue
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> My wife has a 97 Z3 2.8 5 speed and we are having trouble with the heater
> staying warm in the car. Whenever the engine is revved up above idle, the
> heat will kick on, when you stop at a light and idle the engine, the heat
> goes to cold. I'm having thoughts of the thermostat being the culprit, but
> the gauge stays right in the middle, and again...this only happens at idle.
> Any ideas on this?  The car only has 40k miles, so I wouldn't think it would
> be something like a heater core. 

I have real trouble getting much heat out of my 95 328i touring - my WINTER 
car! I stripped and cleaned the heater valve, mine doesn't have an electric 
second pump. I have real trouble getting the car to bleed properly, even tried 
doing it facing up a steep hill with no success.

Just like you I have more heat when the engine is revving higher, say above 
2500 rpm.



------------------------------

Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:51:45 -0800
From: Peter Glaskowsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Here's one for you folks that still cling to the K&N filter myth
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


> Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2008 13:29:25 -0500
> From: KMS- Brett Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: UUC Digest <[email protected]>
> Subject: Here's one for you folks that still cling to the K&N  
> filter myth
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> http://home.stny.rr.com/jbplock/ISO5011/SPICER.htm
>
> You'll note that the K&N was the worst, or second worst, performing
> filter in every test.
>
> Engine builders love K&N filters.
>
> Brett Anderson
> KMS

Uh, I read the data to show that the K&N filter was very bad at  
filtering, but very good at passing air when clean, which is a  
sensible combination. As the report says:

"However, note how the AC Filter, which passed the smallest amount of  
dirt and had the highest dirt capacity and efficiency, also had the  
highest relative restriction to flow. The less efficient filters  
correspondingly had less restriction to flow. This illustrates the  
apparent trade-offs between optimizing a filter for dirt capturing  
ability and maximum airflow."

In particular, the "Initial Restriction" test showed the K&N filter  
caused only a 4.54 inH2O pressure drop, well below all other filters.  
In such a test, lower numbers are better.

However, the K&N filter showed very poor tolerance of dust loading,  
coming in third-worst on that test-- that is, it got "full" with  
around 240 grams of dust. Most filters had less restriction past that  
point, some of them tolerating much higher dust loading.

So it seems like K&N filters would be the preferred choice if you're  
more interested in performance and not so worried about engine damage  
over short periods of time. That's probably only a reasonable  
decision for racing applications.

.              png   (with no K&N filters in my car)



------------------------------

Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 15:02:56 -0500
From: "Matt Bader" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Peter Glaskowsky'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Here's one for you folks that still cling to the K&N filter myth
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Yes, it is definitely a question of trade-offs.  Isn't everything in this
d**n life?  I am using K&N and so now I have to wonder whether I ought to be
changing it for something else.

Matt Bader
98 M3/4
Delaware

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Glaskowsky
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 2:52 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [UUC] Here's one for you folks that still cling to the K&N
filter myth


> Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2008 13:29:25 -0500
> From: KMS- Brett Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: UUC Digest <[email protected]>
> Subject: Here's one for you folks that still cling to the K&N  
> filter myth
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> http://home.stny.rr.com/jbplock/ISO5011/SPICER.htm
>
> You'll note that the K&N was the worst, or second worst, performing
> filter in every test.
>
> Engine builders love K&N filters.
>
> Brett Anderson
> KMS

Uh, I read the data to show that the K&N filter was very bad at  
filtering, but very good at passing air when clean, which is a  
sensible combination. As the report says:

"However, note how the AC Filter, which passed the smallest amount of  
dirt and had the highest dirt capacity and efficiency, also had the  
highest relative restriction to flow. The less efficient filters  
correspondingly had less restriction to flow. This illustrates the  
apparent trade-offs between optimizing a filter for dirt capturing  
ability and maximum airflow."

In particular, the "Initial Restriction" test showed the K&N filter  
caused only a 4.54 inH2O pressure drop, well below all other filters.  
In such a test, lower numbers are better.

However, the K&N filter showed very poor tolerance of dust loading,  
coming in third-worst on that test-- that is, it got "full" with  
around 240 grams of dust. Most filters had less restriction past that  
point, some of them tolerating much higher dust loading.

So it seems like K&N filters would be the preferred choice if you're  
more interested in performance and not so worried about engine damage  
over short periods of time. That's probably only a reasonable  
decision for racing applications.

.              png   (with no K&N filters in my car)


Search the ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]


__________________________________________________________________________
In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the BMW CCA.

UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate
Short Shifter - accept no substitutes!
908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com


------------------------------

Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 12:22:29 -0800
From: Bob Sutterfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Here's one for you folks that still cling to the K&N filter myth
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

On 1/2/08, Matt Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using K&N and so now I have to wonder whether I ought to be
> changing it for something else.
>
> Matt Bader
> 98 M3/4
> Delaware

Depends how long you intend to continue driving the car.

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 20:27:25 +0000
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [email protected] (UUC Digest)
Subject: Re: Here's one for you folks that still cling to the K&N filter myth
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

So where can we find AC Delco filters for our BMWs?

Scott Miller
GGC BMW CCA

>Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2008 13:29:25 -0500
>From: KMS- Brett Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: UUC Digest <[email protected]>
>Subject: Here's one for you folks that still cling to the K&N filter myth
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>http://home.stny.rr.com/jbplock/ISO5011/SPICER.htm
>
>You'll note that the K&N was the worst, or second worst, performing 
>filter in every test.
>
>Engine builders love K&N filters.
>
>Brett Anderson
>KMS

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:28:39 +0000
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [email protected] (UUC Digest)
Subject: Re: Here's one for you folks that still cling to the K&N filter myth
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Tried to find one on the ACDelco web site, not made for my E28.

Good luck otherwise, and I agree- why not use Mahle?

Wonder how the FRAM would compare to the others?

Andy, the Tail Lights Guy
 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> So where can we find AC Delco filters for our BMWs?
> 
> Scott Miller
> GGC BMW CCA

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 13:15:02 -0800
From: Kazuto Okayasu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected] (UUC Digest)
Subject: Re: Here's one for you folks that still cling to the
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

At 12:27 PM 1/2/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Why AC Delco when you can use Mahle?

I decided I didn't need increased filtration flow on my E46 when I 
noticed that the M3 can put out nearly 2x the power of my 325 using 
the same filter.

>So where can we find AC Delco filters for our BMWs?
>
>Scott Miller
>GGC BMW CCA
>
> >Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2008 13:29:25 -0500
> >From: KMS- Brett Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: UUC Digest <[email protected]>
> >Subject: Here's one for you folks that still cling to the K&N filter myth
> >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >http://home.stny.rr.com/jbplock/ISO5011/SPICER.htm
> >
> >You'll note that the K&N was the worst, or second worst, performing
> >filter in every test.
> >
> >Engine builders love K&N filters.
> >
> >Brett Anderson
> >KMS
>Search the ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>
>
>__________________________________________________________________________
>In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the BMW CCA.
>
>UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate
>Short Shifter - accept no substitutes!
>908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com

Kazuto Okayasu  Manager, Desktop Support Services
Administrative Computing Services, University of California, Irvine
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


------------------------------

Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 15:45:54 -0600
From: "Bill Proud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "UUC Digest" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Here's one for you folks that still cling to the K&N filter myth
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

FRAM = BARF = fourletter words !!

Beepee .....who stix with WIX when Mahle fail to be avail .  (WIX = NAPA )
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "UUC Digest" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: [UUC] Here's one for you folks that still cling to the K&N 
filter myth


> Tried to find one on the ACDelco web site, not made for my E28.
>
> Good luck otherwise, and I agree- why not use Mahle?
>
> Wonder how the FRAM would compare to the others?
>
> Andy, the Tail Lights Guy
> -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> So where can we find AC Delco filters for our BMWs?
>>
>> Scott Miller
>> GGC BMW CCA
> Search the ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the BMW CCA.
>
> UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate
> Short Shifter - accept no substitutes!
> 908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com 


------------------------------

Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 15:56:04 -0500
From: Neil Maller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Here's one for you folks that still cling to the K&N filter myth
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

on 1/2/08 2:20 PM, KMS- Brett Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> http://home.stny.rr.com/jbplock/ISO5011/SPICER.htm
> You'll note that the K&N was the worst, or second worst, performing
> filter in every test.

Too bad they didn't test any graduated density/layered foam filters, such as
the ITG. I've been using an ITG for quite some years now, and while it's
hard for an owner to quantify effectiveness, I can at least say that the
intake tract downstream of the filter passes the white glove test with
flying colours. On the other hand, my M3 doesn't exactly get driven off-road
through desert sandstorms.

Neil
Fort Wayne, IN
96 M3      - Bastard child
03 525iT   - Sterling Grey Metallic
05 Mini    - Cooper S with LSD




------------------------------

Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 17:03:34 -0500
From: Vic Maslanka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected] (UUC Digest)
Subject: Re: Here's one for you folks that still cling to the  K&N
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Scott, next time add the /sarcasm/ tags.

Vic

At 04:28 PM 1/2/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Tried to find one on the ACDelco web site, not made for my E28.
>
>Good luck otherwise, and I agree- why not use Mahle?
>
>Wonder how the FRAM would compare to the others?
>
>Andy, the Tail Lights Guy
>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > So where can we find AC Delco filters for our BMWs?
> >
> > Scott Miller
> > GGC BMW CCA
>Search the ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]



------------------------------

Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 14:27:58 -0800
From: "John Coffin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'UUC Digest'" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Here's one for you folks that still cling to the  K&N
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

It's that the default setting for Scott?  ;)

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vic Maslanka
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 2:04 PM
To: UUC Digest
Subject: Re: [UUC] Here's one for you folks that still cling to the K&N

Scott, next time add the /sarcasm/ tags.

Vic

>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > So where can we find AC Delco filters for our BMWs?
> >
> > Scott Miller
> > GGC BMW CCA


------------------------------

Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 19:02:56 EST
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Remembering Michel Potheau
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Gruppe:
 
It was about this time 4 or 5 years ago that I heard the sad news of Michel's 
passing.  What year was it Brett?  I'm sure you remember.

Anyway, I'm sure those of us who were helped along the way by Michel's vast 
knowledge of "things BMW" miss his wisdom and friendship.
 
Rest in peace my friend,

John Weese



**************************************See AOL's top rated recipes 
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:15:09 -0500
From: KMS- Brett Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Remembering Michel Potheau
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Jan 6, 2003.  He is still missed.

Brett Anderson
KMS


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Gruppe:
>  
> It was about this time 4 or 5 years ago that I heard the sad news of Michel's 
> passing.  What year was it Brett?  I'm sure you remember.
> 
> Anyway, I'm sure those of us who were helped along the way by Michel's vast 
> knowledge of "things BMW" miss his wisdom and friendship.
>  
> Rest in peace my friend,
> 
> John Weese

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 19:22:14 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Remembering Michel Potheau
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Indeed, still missed.   Strange to think five years have gone by
already.

The UUC Digest is still dedicated to him.

- Rob

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [UUC]  Remembering Michel Potheau
> From: KMS- Brett Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, January 02, 2008 9:15 pm
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Jan 6, 2003.  He is still missed.
> Brett Anderson
> KMS
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Gruppe:
> >
> > It was about this time 4 or 5 years ago that I heard the sad news of 
> > Michel's
> > passing.  What year was it Brett?  I'm sure you remember.
> >
> > Anyway, I'm sure those of us who were helped along the way by Michel's vast
> > knowledge of "things BMW" miss his wisdom and friendship.
> >
> > Rest in peace my friend,
> >
> > John Weese
> Search the ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
> __________________________________________________________________________
> In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the BMW CCA.
> UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate
> Short Shifter - accept no substitutes!
> 908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com


------------------------------

Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 18:09:04 -0600
From: "Bill Proud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "2002digest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "E21 Digest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        "E9coupes BMW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        "Sixer Group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        "Uucdigest" <[email protected]>,
        "Senior Digest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: German seat leather source 
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I just found this site thru information published on a digest for other 
German cars (initials MB ) .
When you click on the highlighted 'here' button the popup tells you they do 
original spec leder for all kinds of German cars ..incl BMW .

Dunno anything about their prices etc so caveat emptor ....

http://www.cut-lederservice.de/english/index_eng.htm

Apparently the source for German auto leather for 160 yrs went out of bizniz 
(environmental ? ) in mid 90's so these guys are as close to the original 
cow as you can get .

Having just had a pair of E30 leather fronts re-upholstered I can tell you 
that the leather on the seat-bottom (butt-holder ) IS thicker than on the 
backs . You may want to look for that capability in your supplier ....

Bill Proud 


------------------------------

End of [bmwuucdigest] digest(15 messages)
**********

Reply via email to