[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13402773#comment-13402773
 ] 

Sijie Guo commented on BOOKKEEPER-310:
--------------------------------------

{quote}
This was observed as part of a test run - since the fix was obvious, i did not 
try to debug it further.
Unfortunately, I do not have the test details now.
{quote}

I don't think the fix was obvious. since the number of buckets is 3 * 9 + 2, 
the bucket index should not be large than it. your fix is not on the root 
cause. Finding root cause is more important before a fix.
                
> Changes in hedwig server to support JMS spec
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BOOKKEEPER-310
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-310
>             Project: Bookkeeper
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Mridul Muralidharan
>         Attachments: hedwig-server.patch
>
>
> The primary changes are :
> a) Support modified protocol changes (optional body).
> b) Return the published message's seq-id in the response.
> c) Minor bugfix to Array indexing in bucket which was triggered in a testcase.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to