On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 03:38:31PM -0500, CJ Kucera wrote:

> First, we have to know without a doubt who was behind this.  Absolute
> proof.  When we've got that, we restrict our operations to those
> people.

Can you have "absolute proof" of anything? In the American justice
system, they talk about "beyond a reasonable doubt". But I knew someone
who was being interviewed for possibly serving on a jury and he asked
what percentage uncertainty constitutes a reasonable doubt. They
promptly rejected him from the jury (too scientific?).


Reply via email to