John D. Giorgis wrote: > At 07:10 AM 3/16/02 -0800 Nick Arnett wrote: > >>Please provide an example of when the Democratic Party, any of its leaders, >>argued that lying is not important. I'm having a hard time recalling any >>such statements. >> > > The numerous writings and speeches of Democrats that a simple crime like > perjury was not important enough to merit impeachment are a matter of the > historical record - do you seriously think that they don't exist? > "not important" and "not an impeachable offense" are not even close to being synonymous statements. -- Doug email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zo.com/~brighto "Now people stand themselves next to the righteous And they believe the things they say are true They speak in terms of what divides us To justify the violence they do" Jackson Browne, It Is One
- Re: Steel tariffs John D. Giorgis
- Re: Steel tariffs Dan Minette
- RE: Steel tariffs Gautam Mukunda
- Re: Steel tariffs Dan Minette
- Re: Steel tariffs John D. Giorgis
- RE: Steel tariffs Nick Arnett
- Lieing Isn't Important to Democrats RE: Stee... John D. Giorgis
- Got another bounce (trying new spelling) Re:... Julia Thompson
- Re: Got another bounce Julia Thompson
- RE: Lieing Isn't Important to Democrats RE: ... Nick Arnett
- Nixon vs. Clinton Doug
- Nixon vs. Clinton Dan Minette
- Re: Nixon vs. Clinton John D. Giorgis
- Re: Steel tariffs Matt Grimaldi
- Impeachment Redux Re: Steel tariffs John D. Giorgis
- Honest GOP? was Re: Steel tariffs Doug
- Re: Honest GOP? was Re: Steel tariffs John D. Giorgis
- Re: Honest GOP? was Re: Steel tariffs Doug
- Re: Honest GOP? was Re: Steel tariffs Robert Seeberger
- Re: Honest GOP? was Re: Steel tariffs Julia Thompson
- Re: Honest GOP? was Re: Steel tariffs Robert Seeberger
