On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 6:32 PM, John Williams <jwilliams4...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > >>Actually, a health insurance market without government interference > >>would be a lot more consumer-driven than the current system, which > >>is why I mentioned it. In nearly all cases, if there is to be a > > > > Howso? > > Competition for consumer business. Is there some way in which "consumer-driven" means something other than "unregulated?" Is health care so unimportant that it deserves no regulation? Is health care so unimportant that people should have to compete with each other (that's the other side of the equation when the companies are competing) for basic care? If we take it as a given that a consumer-driven market for health care is better, then why not do the same with roads, police, water, oxygen, etc.? How do you draw the line there? Nick
_______________________________________________ http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
