On Wednesday 28 July 2010 14:13:44 Ivan Shmakov wrote: > For those wishing for a better experience, a Linux kernel module > version of Mach could be developed at some time later.
That would be quite neat. Then adding Hurd to other distributions would be easy, too. > Then, the sole question will be the tasks that Hurd covers. > Eventually, some users may find that they use little or no > native Linux modules, but instead use the Hurd ones. The > transition to GNU/Hurd[/Linux] will be over for them. That sounds like the most powerful way to spread the Hurd. People could then create 3rd party programs which depend on the Hurd and run on every GNU/Linux distribution out there. Reasons for switching from GNU/Hurd/Linux to a Hurd without Linux could then be * have a cleaner system or * go GPLv3. Maybe also * „Linux gets pushed into directions I don’t like“. Do you see other reasons? Best wishes, Arne
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
