Would it be better to add it as an optional flag or a mandatory argument? And is this script called anywhere other than these two installers?
AG On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Keith Mitchell <[email protected]>wrote: > > >> - There isn't a better way to communicate to the GRUB menu ICT than >>> deleting one of the files, which are generally assumed to be >>> persistent by the existing design? >>> >>> >>> We would imagine that there is but couldn't come up with one. We were >>> thinking that we would have to change the script to require an extra >>> argument specifying whether the installed system had graphics or not. >>> >>> >> This is actually a general problem in the ICT design - it attempts to >> infer its actions based on artifacts in the image rather than from direct >> instruction by the calling program, which of course knows what type of >> installation is being done. It may be beyond the scope of what you can do >> in the time allotted, but if possible it would be good to pass an arg to >> install-finish instead. >> > > +1 to adding an arg to install-finish > > - Keith > > > >> Dave >> >> _______________________________________________ >> caiman-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss >> > >
_______________________________________________ caiman-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
