I don't know. If I had all the answers I'd be richer then bill gates :).
Maybe the chief of staffs? Maybe abolish the chief of staff which is
political appointed( I think not sure). How about having the highest ranking
officer in each branch get together and vote for a chief. That chief has
full control over military actions. When the majority of congress votes to
enter a conflict, the chief takes over. This way you have an expert leading
the operation instead of a novice.
-George
>From: "Bruce Heerssen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Waaay OT: US elections (soap boxish)
>Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 12:13:51 -0600
>
>
> > Maybe it was a bad idea to make the president commander of all armed
>forces.
> >
> >
>The armed forces are under civilian control by deliberate design.
>Militaries,
>however, cannot be effectively run by committee because the need for action
>can
>quickly outpace a committee's ability to respond. Someone has to be in firm
>control at the top; so if it's not the president (the top elected
>civilian), who
>then? Who else should we trust with the security of our nation?
>
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
>http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
>
>Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
