The claim was Bush was filtering out none supporters.
I pointed out how violent these people are getting.
Suggesting it might be a good saftey measure.
Now you turned it into the guy blaming Kerry is a
liar.
-sm
--- Howie Hamlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There was an obvious tie to Watergate since the
> subject was a breakin. The republican in the story
> was spewing out conjecture and associating John
> Kerry with the breakins. I don't have to prove he
> didn't do it (and I'm sure he was not involved).
> The real question should be about the guy making the
> initial accusations.
>
> What is his source?
>
> How does he know?
>
> And, no, I don't condone criminal behavior.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Andy Ousterhout
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 2:21 PM
> Subject: RE: Bush, Kerry and non-admittance
>
>
> Howie,
> How do you know? What is your source? And how
> did you make the leap to
> Watergate? It actually has no relevance to Sam's
> email. And nowhere is
> criminal activity mentioned. But now that you
> bring it up...
>
> Do you believe that this was proper behavior? Is
> so, why didn't you choose to
> defend versus condemn it?
>
> Andy
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
