about spying/theft. But lets move past that....
I don't see any conjecture. Are you denying that the event happened? If so,
on what are you basing this? If the event did happen, are you denying that it
was wrong? If it was wrong, then who is to blame?
Andy
-----Original Message-----
From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 1:53 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush, Kerry and non-admittance
There was an obvious tie to Watergate since the subject was a breakin. The
republican in the story was spewing out conjecture and associating John Kerry
with the breakins. I don't have to prove he didn't do it (and I'm sure he was
not involved). The real question should be about the guy making the initial
accusations.
What is his source?
How does he know?
And, no, I don't condone criminal behavior.
----- Original Message -----
From: Andy Ousterhout
To: CF-Community
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 2:21 PM
Subject: RE: Bush, Kerry and non-admittance
Howie,
How do you know? What is your source? And how did you make the leap to
Watergate? It actually has no relevance to Sam's email. And nowhere is
criminal activity mentioned. But now that you bring it up...
Do you believe that this was proper behavior? Is so, why didn't you
choose to
defend versus condemn it?
Andy
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
