-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 2:35 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush, Kerry and non-admittance
No, I'm not saying that what they did was right. I'm not condoning it
at all. I'm merely pointing out that Sam's assertion of causality is
backwards. I think both sides are wrong.
-Kevin
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 14:17:51 -0500, Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> By your words, you are condoning it. It is not their fault, they were
incited
> to riot. I am sorry, but that is a load of crap.
>
> There is no excuse for this behavior if it did indeed occur. There is a
right
> and wrong. This was wrong. This is no better than republican's blocking
> access to abortion clinics. Neither group has the right to infringe on
> other's rights or to destroy other's property. No excuses. None.
Zip......
>
> Andy
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 2:07 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Bush, Kerry and non-admittance
>
> Pfft. Up here that's called a party. You should visit for Halloween.
> Hordes on the march. Broken windows, looted stores, torched cars. It's
> a blast.
>
> Seriously though, you have a cart/horse problem. Bush has been
> stomping on people's 1st Amendment right to assemble since he's been
> in office. This event in Minnesota just happened in response to that.
> I don't condone the violence, but it's not the Dems that started the
> fight.
>
> -Kevin
>
> On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 10:41:22 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > And here's why:
> >
> > Angry Kerry Activists Lay Siege to Bush Office in St.
> > Paul, Intimidate Voters
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
