No, I'm not saying that what they did was right. I'm not condoning it
at all. I'm merely pointing out that Sam's assertion of causality is
backwards. I think both sides are wrong.

-Kevin

On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 14:17:51 -0500, Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By your words, you are condoning it.  It is not their fault, they were incited
> to riot.   I am sorry, but that is a load of crap.
>
> There is no excuse for this behavior if it did indeed occur.  There is a right
> and wrong.  This was wrong.  This is no better than republican's blocking
> access to abortion clinics.  Neither group has the right to infringe on
> other's rights or to destroy other's property.  No excuses. None.  Zip......
>
> Andy
>
>
>   -----Original Message-----
>   From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 2:07 PM
>   To: CF-Community
>   Subject: Re: Bush, Kerry and non-admittance
>
>   Pfft. Up here that's called a party. You should visit for Halloween.
>   Hordes on the march. Broken windows, looted stores, torched cars. It's
>   a blast.
>
>   Seriously though, you have a cart/horse problem. Bush has been
>   stomping on people's 1st Amendment right to assemble since he's been
>   in office. This event in Minnesota just happened in response to that.
>   I don't condone the violence, but it's not the Dems that started the
>   fight.
>
>   -Kevin
>
>   On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 10:41:22 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>   > And here's why:
>   >
>   > Angry Kerry Activists Lay Siege to Bush Office in St.
>   > Paul, Intimidate Voters
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to