getting". So are you saying that if you're not a Bush supporter you
are violent and must be kept out of the event?
I don't really think that's the reasoning. I'm more convinced that
this president doesn't really care for opposing views and would rather
not hear them from anyone, Senate, House, FBI, CIA, Foreign Nations
included.
Marlon
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 12:11:23 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You jump around a lot.
>
> The claim was Bush was filtering out none supporters.
> I pointed out how violent these people are getting.
> Suggesting it might be a good saftey measure.
> Now you turned it into the guy blaming Kerry is a
> liar.
>
> -sm
>
> --- Howie Hamlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > There was an obvious tie to Watergate since the
> > subject was a breakin. The republican in the story
> > was spewing out conjecture and associating John
> > Kerry with the breakins. I don't have to prove he
> > didn't do it (and I'm sure he was not involved).
> > The real question should be about the guy making the
> > initial accusations.
> >
> > What is his source?
> >
> > How does he know?
> >
> > And, no, I don't condone criminal behavior.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Andy Ousterhout
> > To: CF-Community
> > Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 2:21 PM
> > Subject: RE: Bush, Kerry and non-admittance
> >
> >
> > Howie,
> > How do you know? What is your source? And how
> > did you make the leap to
> > Watergate? It actually has no relevance to Sam's
> > email. And nowhere is
> > criminal activity mentioned. But now that you
> > bring it up...
> >
> > Do you believe that this was proper behavior? Is
> > so, why didn't you choose to
> > defend versus condemn it?
> >
> > Andy
> >
> >
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
