But the extremists seem to always show up, in this
case by the busload. I don't here about violent events
at Democratic functions but I read them daily at
Republican. They shot up the Republican headquarters
yesterday.
These people do not represent the majority of
Democrats but there only needs to be a few determined
crackpots to ruin it for everyone.
-sm
--- Marlon Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sam, you're jumping quite far now with "how violent
> these people are
> getting". So are you saying that if you're not a
> Bush supporter you
> are violent and must be kept out of the event?
>
> I don't really think that's the reasoning. I'm more
> convinced that
> this president doesn't really care for opposing
> views and would rather
> not hear them from anyone, Senate, House, FBI, CIA,
> Foreign Nations
> included.
>
> Marlon
>
>
>
> On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 12:11:23 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You jump around a lot.
> >
> > The claim was Bush was filtering out none
> supporters.
> > I pointed out how violent these people are
> getting.
> > Suggesting it might be a good saftey measure.
> > Now you turned it into the guy blaming Kerry is a
> > liar.
> >
> > -sm
> >
> > --- Howie Hamlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > There was an obvious tie to Watergate since the
> > > subject was a breakin. The republican in the
> story
> > > was spewing out conjecture and associating John
> > > Kerry with the breakins. I don't have to prove
> he
> > > didn't do it (and I'm sure he was not involved).
> > > The real question should be about the guy making
> the
> > > initial accusations.
> > >
> > > What is his source?
> > >
> > > How does he know?
> > >
> > > And, no, I don't condone criminal behavior.
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Andy Ousterhout
> > > To: CF-Community
> > > Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 2:21 PM
> > > Subject: RE: Bush, Kerry and non-admittance
> > >
> > >
> > > Howie,
> > > How do you know? What is your source? And
> how
> > > did you make the leap to
> > > Watergate? It actually has no relevance to
> Sam's
> > > email. And nowhere is
> > > criminal activity mentioned. But now that you
> > > bring it up...
> > >
> > > Do you believe that this was proper behavior?
> Is
> > > so, why didn't you choose to
> > > defend versus condemn it?
> > >
> > > Andy
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
