OK, fair enough, but I still think you're implying something ridiculous here...I noticed you didn't respond to the marriage comment, either. I mean, you put a reference to marriage in the subject, then played th passive-aggressive card (or actually, in this case it would be aggressive-passive), saying "I didn't make any statements". But that's not really what I wanted to know about anyways.
To put it bluntly: Are you saying that if we let two Homosexshuls get married, we should let Fifi and her owner get married, too? Chesty Puller wrote: > I didn't make any statements, I asked why was it harmful to the dog. It > probably is harmful, but I don't know why it is, and I was asking Gel to > explain why it was since he seemed to know about the research. Sometimes > questions are meant to be answered as they are asked. > > - Matt > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ray Champagne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Community" <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 2:52 PM > Subject: Re: Maybe one day we'll allow them to get married. > > > >>Dude, are you serious? Are you asking why sexually assaulting a dog is >>harmful to the dog? Would you like it? >> >>And I'm sorry, but if you're fishing at comparing homosexual marriage to >>man and dog, it just is not comparable. One's the conscious decision of >>two willing persons, the other is abuse of an animal, plain and simple. >> They just aren't the same, and I get tried of hearing that argument... >> >>Chesty Puller wrote: >> >>>Does this research exist? How would you get it? Why is it harmful? >>> >>>- Matt >>> >>> >>>----- Original Message ----- >>>From: "Vivec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>To: "CF-Community" <[email protected]> >>>Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 2:40 PM >>>Subject: Re: Maybe one day we'll allow them to get married. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>Yup. >>>>Soon people will be marrying their dogs. >>>>*smirk* >>>>Why should ANYTHING be seen as immoral after all? >>>> >>>>The fact that the writer didn't touch on the research which says such >>>>interactions are harmful to the animal and should fall under Cruelty >>>>to animals is interesting. >>>> >>>>On 12/28/05, Chesty Puller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>http://www.slate.com/id/103801/ >>>>> >>>>>- Matt >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:189972 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
