See, Gel.

I completely disagree with this entire diatribe.

Every paragraph has elements of truth, but twists the facts to make their point.

I don't buy it.

On 2/10/06, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "It's quite interesting reading the comments and opinions.
>
> However, many people, myself included often fall victim to so called
> conventional wisdom (it's the truth since everyone says it is).
> "This is about free speech"
>
> Despite what you have heard, this is not about free speech. This is not
> because Islam prohibits idolatry and we don't have pictures of The Prophet.
> This is not about free speech.
>
> An ultra right wing, ultra conservative, anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant
> newspaper publishes cartoons that depict the Prophet Muhammad (peace be unto
> him) as a terrorist. Even the US govt's official statement is that the
> cartoons were grossly offensive.
> This is not about free speech.
>
> Note: previously this same newspaper turned down similar cartoons of Jesus
> because they thought it was too offensive.
> http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2006/02/09/1139379578740.html
> This is not about free speech.
>
> Arab governments try to meet and diffuse the issue but are snubbed by the
> Danish Government.
> This is not about free speech.
>
> Despite the fact that free speech and a free press are not problems in
> European nations, in an effort to defend free speech some nations republish
> the cartoons.
> This is not about free speech.
>
> Think about this in perspective, what do you think would have happened if
> during the late Martin Luther King's wife funeral some reps from the local
> KKK arm showed up distributing pamphlets? Is that not free speech too? Do
> you think much dialogue would have ensued? I think not.
> This is not about free speech.
>
> We often forget that the great bastion of free speech; the US; not too long
> ago had their own issues in Los Angeles; remember Rodney King anyone?????
> Riots erupted in Los Angeles because one section of the population felt that
> they were being victimized. Or maybe you see it from the other side, riots
> erupted because minority group refused to accept the judgment after due
> process.
> This is not about free speech.
>
> Many people are quick to talk about The July 1990 coup. Everyone remembers
> that the perpetrators were from the Jamaat al Muslimeen mosque. You ask any
> Muslim in Trinidad and they will condemn what they did.
> But I assure you, the subsequent looting of businesses was a truly
> cosmopolitan affair. Truly, that day every creed and race was tiefing all
> over the place. Mob mentality is not exclusive to one race/creed.
> This is not about free speech.
>
> In an *equally* offensive turn of events the graphics editor of the
> newspaper Hamshahri (Iran gov't) announced a competition for cartoons on the
> Holocaust with an ultimatum for the Danish newspaper to publish them. The
> paper's editor-in-chief said that Jyllands-posten under no circumstances
> would publish the Holocaust cartoons.
> This is not about free speech.
>
> Mob mentality eventually takes over. Embassies get torched, flags get burnt
> and people get killed. But some still sing the mantra. "This is about free
> speech".
> This is not about free speech. This is not about democracy. This is not
> about a free press. There is no such thing as a free press, there is no such
> thing as free speech and last time I checked, democracy was a form of
> government.
>
> This is about xenophobia. Go wiki that"
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:196692
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to