maybe the problem here is that I am not watching television news. Have they 
been burning bodies or something? I don't understand your emotional response. 

We certainly have a failure to communicate. I find your analogy rather 
offensive, and not reflective of what I am saying. 

I am saying that I would not have done it.

I am saying that we -- all of us -- are ignorant at times. A Danish newspaper 
published an ignorant cartoon and got an ignorant response. It's deplorable 
that innocents were hurt, yes. Absolutely. But I don't see it as proof ot the 
depravity of an entire panoply of cultures. 

Whereas you seem to. It troubles me that intelligent people seem to be drinking 
the koolaid.



>> Dana wrote:
>> I don't
>> think they were wise, nor, given what I am hearing, do I think that their 
>> motives
>> were pure. I see hidden agendas on both sides, myself.
>>
>
>Why should any manner of expression of opinion be "unwise"?  Isn't
>that really saying that your society doesn't value free speech?
>
>I understand your point, but it feels like an implicit endorsement of
>violence or at least an acceptance of it.  People should be allowed to
>publish provocative cartoons and other should be allowed to peacefully
>protest.  If those protests become violent the police should shut that
>down with whatever force is necessary.
>
>Under no circumstances do I think we should in any way lessen the
>violent reaction.  It's equivalent to saying, "Sure rape is wrong, but
>by wearing the miniskirt she was asking for it."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:196906
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to