>> Dana wrote:
>> Second of all, there is in fact, I am told, considerable xenophobia in 
>> Denmark
>
>Overall this, to me, is a pure free speech issue.  Gel has brought up
>points such as talking about Nazis in Germany.
>
>The thing there is that Nazis are criminals.  The limit of free speech
>is where it infringes on the rights of others (yelling fire in a
>theatre) or provides information about illegal acts such as child
>pr0n.
>
>Inevitably something somebody publishes is going to offend someone at
>some point, so you can't base a policy on this grey area of 'offense'.
> You simply have to educate people on how to properly oppose something
>they're offended by via publishing their own content, boycotting the
>publication, peaceful legal protests, boycotting the advertisers, etc.
>
>Further, the point has been made that many of the protesters
>destroying Danish gov't property (despite the fact that the
>publication was private) do so because they cannot distinguish between
>private and gov't publications.  That is, their own gov'ts typically
>control the news and they assume the Denmark gov't controls the
>cartoon paper.
>
>Don't know if that's true, but it may be a good point.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:196880
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to